Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
The present article has the objective of emphasizing differences among the concepts of orthodox marketing, societal marketing and social marketing in order to clarify possible misunderstandings and indiscriminate use of them. We present here a historical approach to these different concepts, their practice and evolution within organizations. Although the practice of marketing refers to the use of defined tools and objective that is the management of exchange, the marketing concept adopted influences outcomes. As a consequence, activities related to marketing should be developed considering these differentiations. This article does not have the pretension to discuss all about this subject but to provoke a debate about it. It intends to prevent proliferation of inadequate use of these referring terms according to their specific concepts that has contributed negatively to the process of teaching, learning, and practicing marketing in society.
Key-words: Marketing. Societal marketing. Social marketing.
If a paper is approved for publication, its copyright has to be transferred by the author(s) to the Review of Business Management – RBGN.
Accordingly, authors are REQUIRED to send RBGN a duly completed and signed Copyright Transfer Form. Please refer to the following template: [Copyright Transfer]
The conditions set out by the Copyright Transfer Form state that the Review of Business Management – RBGN owns, free of charge and permanently, the copyright of the papers it publishes. Although the authors are required to sign the Copyright Transfer Form, RBGN allows authors to hold and use their own copyright without restrictions.
The texts published by RBGN are the sole responsibility of their authors.
The review has adopted the CC-BY Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 allowing redistribution and reuse of papers on condition that the authorship is properly credited.