Teleworking in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic: advantages, disadvantages and influencing factors – the workers' perspective
pdf (English)

Palabras clave

Teleworking
telecommuting
Covid-19
advantages
disadvantages

Cómo citar

Brandão, S., & Ramos, M. (2023). Teleworking in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic: advantages, disadvantages and influencing factors – the workers’ perspective. RBGN Revista Brasileira De Gestão De Negócios, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v25i2.4221

Resumen

Purpose – This study analyses workers' perceptions of the advantages and disadvantages of teleworking in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic, identifies factors that influence these perceptions, and verifies workers' intentions to maintain this work arrangement after the pandemic.

Theoretical framework – By conducting a comprehensive literature review, we identified the advantages and disadvantages of teleworking and selected factors that have a significant influence over it.

Design/methodology/approach – This is an exploratory and quantitative study, with primary data collection using a survey to identify the context of the teleworking experience and workers' perceptions of the advantages and disadvantages associated with this work arrangement. The sample obtained was 304 individuals. The data collected were processed using descriptive and inferential statistical analysis.

Findings – The teleworking experience was essentially positive. Most workers intend to maintain this arrangement after the pandemic. The conditions offered by the organizations and the existence of an adequate workspace at home were factors that strongly influenced workers' perceptions of the advantages and disadvantages of teleworking.

Practical & social implications of research – Considering workers' perceived benefits and willingness to remain teleworking, organizations should implement and manage teleworking programs with the understanding that organizational factors greatly influence the teleworker's experience and are critical to the success of this practice.

Originality/value – This study provides additional data concerning the teleworking experience during the Covid-19 pandemic and, to the best of our knowledge, it is one of the first studies to focus on the perception of Portuguese workers regarding the advantages and disadvantages of teleworking and to identify influencing factors.

Keywords – teleworking; telecommuting; Covid-19; advantages; disadvantages

https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v25i2.4221
pdf (English)

Citas

ANDRADE, C., & LOUSÃ, E. P. (2021). Telework and work–family conflict during COVID-19 lockdown in Portugal: The influence of job-related factors. Administrative Sciences, 11(103), 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/admsci11030103.

BAILEY, D. E., & KURLAND, N. B. (2002). A review of telework research: Findings, new directions and lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(4), 383-400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.144.

BARUCH, Y. (2000). Teleworking: Benefits and pitfalls as perceived by professionals and managers. New Technology, Work and Employment, 15(1), 34-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-005X.00063.

BARUCH, Y., & NICHOLSON, N. (1997). Home sweet work: Requirements for effective home working. Journal of General Management, 23(2), 15-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030630709702300202.

BECKEL, J. L. O., & FISHER, G. G. (2022). Telework and worker health and well-being: A review and recommendations for research and practice. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,

(7), 3879. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19073879.PMid:35409563.

BELZUNEGUI-ERASO, A., & ERRO-GARCÉS, A. (2020). Teleworking in the context of the Covid-19 crisis. Sustainability, 12(3662), 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12093662.

BLAHOPOULOU, J., ORTIZ-BONNIN, S., MONTANEZ-JUAN, M., TORRENS ESPINOSA, G., & GARCIA-BUADES, M. E. (2022). Telework

satisfaction, wellbeing and performance in the digital era. Lessons learned during COVID-19 lockdown in Spain. Current Psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 41(5), 2507-2520. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02873-x.

CARILLO, K., CACHAT-ROSSET, G., MARSAN, J., SABA, T., & KLARSFELD, A. (2020). Adjusting to epidemic-induced telework: Empirical insights from teleworkers in France. European Journal of Information Systems, 30(1), 69-88.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1829512.

DE VRIES, H., TUMMERS, L., & BEKKERS, V. (2018). The benefits of teleworking in the public sector: Reality or rhetoric? Review of Public Personnel Administration, 39(4), 570-593. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0734371X18760124.

DIMA, A., TUCLEA, C., VRÂNCEANU, D., & TIGU, G. (2019). Sustainable social and individual implications of telework: A new insight into the romanian labor market. Sustainability, 11(3506), 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11133506.

DOBERSTEIN, C., & CHARBONNEAU, E. (2022). Alienation in pandemic-induced telework in the public sector. Public Personnel Management, 51(4), 491-515. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00910260221114788.

Eurofound and the International Labour Office. (2017). Working anytime, anywhere: The effects on the world of work. Publications Office of the European Union and the International Labour Office. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/---publ/documents/publication/wcms_544138.pdf

Eurostat. 2019. Employed persons working from home as a percentage of the total employment, by sex, age and professional status. Eurostat.

FIELD, A. (2017). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

FILARDI, F., CASTRO, R., & ZANINI, M. (2020). Advantages and disadvantages of teleworking in Brazilian public administration: Analysis of SERPRO and Federal Revenue experiences. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 18(1), 28-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1679-395174605x.

GONÇALVES, S. P., SANTOS, J. V., SILVA, I. S., VELOSO, A., BRANDÃO, C., & MOURA, R. (2021). COVID-19 and people management: The view of human resource managers. Administrative Sciences, 11(69), 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/admsci11030069.

HAIR, J., BLACK, W. C., BABIN, B. J., & ANDERSON, R. E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Pearson

Educational.

HARPAZ, I. (2002). Advantages and disadvantages of telecommuting for the individual, organization and society. Work Study Emerald, 51(2), 74-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00438020210418791.

Instituto Nacional de Estatística. (2020). Trabalho a partir de cada - Módulo ad hoc do inquérito ao emprego: Destaque - informação à comunicação social (relatório de inquérito). Instituto Nacional de Estatítica.

IPSEN, C., VAN VELDHOVEN, M., KIRCHNER, K., & HANSEN, J. P. (2021). Six key advantages and disadvantages of working from home in Europe during COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), 1826. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041826. PMid:33668505.

KIM, T., MULLINS, L. B., & YOON, T. (2021). Supervision of telework: A key to organizational performance. American Review of Public Administration, 51(4), 263-277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0275074021992058.

KURKLAND, N. B., & BAILEY, D. E. (1999). Telework the advantages and challenges of working here, there, anywhere and anytime. Organizational Dynamics, 28(2), 53-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0090-2616(00)80016-9.

KURLAND, N. B., & COOPER, C. D. (2002). Manager control and employee isolation in telecommuting environments. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 13(1), 107-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1047-8310(01)00051-7.

MADSEN, S. R. (2003). The benefits, challenges, and implications of teleworking: A literature review. 1-21 http://works.bepress.com/susan_madsen/50

MAILLOT, A. S., MEYER, T., PRUNIER-POULMAIRE, S., & VAYRE, E. A. (2022). Qualitative and longitudinal study on the impact of telework in times of COVID-19. Sustainability, 14(8731), 1-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su14148731.

MAROCO, J. (2018). Análise estatística com o SPSS. (7.ed.). Report Number.

MASSOUDI, A. H., & HAMDI, S. A. (2017). The consequence of work environment on employees productivity. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 19(1), 35-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.9790/487X-1901033542.

MELLO, J. A. (2007). Managing telework programs effectively. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 19(4), 247-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10672-007-9051-1.

MUSTAFA, M., & GOLD, M. (2013). ‘Chained to my work’? Strategies to manage temporal and physical boundaries among self-employed teleworkers. Human Resource Management Journal, 23(4), 413-429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12009.

NAKROŠIENĖ, A., BUCIUNIENĖ, I., & GOSTAUTAITĖ, B. (2019). Working from home: Characteristics and outcomes of telework. International Journal of Manpower, 40(1), 87-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJM-07-2017-0172.

NILLES, J. M. (1975). Telecommunications and organizational decentralization. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 23(10), 1142-1147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TCOM.1975.1092687.

NUNES, F. (2005). Most relevant enablers and constraints influencing the spread of telework in Portugal. New Technology, Work and Employment, 20(2), 133-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-005X.2005.00149.x.

OLLO-LOPEZ, A., GONI-LEGAZ, S., & ERROGARCES, A. (2020). Home-based telework: Usefulness and facilitators. International Journal of Manpower, 42(4), 644-660. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJM-02-2020-0062.

Organização Internacional do Trabalho. (2020). Teletrabalho durante e após a pandemia da COVID-19: Guia prático. OIT.

PYÖRIÄ, P. (2011). Managing telework: Risks, fears and rules. Management Research Review, 34(4), 386-399.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01409171111117843.

SOUSA-UVA, M., SOUSA-UVA, A., SAMPAYO, M. M., & SERRANHEIRA, F. (2021). Telework during the COVID-19 epidemic in Portugal and determinants of job satisfaction: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 21(1), 2217.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12295-2. PMid:34865641.

TAVARES, A. I. (2017). Telework and health effects review. International Journal of Healthcare, 3(2), 30-36.

http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/ijh.v3n2p30.

TAVARES, F., SANTOS, E., DIOGO, A., & RATTEN, V. (2021). Teleworking in Portuguese communities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 15(3),334-349.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JEC-06-2020-0113.

 

Una vez aprobada la publicación del artículo, el/los autor/es cede/n los derechos de copyright a la Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios – RBGN.

Es OBLIGATORIO que los autores envíen a la RBGN el formulario de Cesión de Derechos de Autor debidamente cumplimentado y firmado según el modelo: [Derechos de autor]

Las condiciones de la Cesión de Derechos de Autor indican que la Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios – RBGN goza a título gratuito y en carácter definitivo de los derechos de autor patrimoniales de los artículos publicados por ella. A pesar de la Cesión de los Derechos de Autor, la RBGN faculta a los autores al uso de estos derechos sin restricciones.

Los autores se responsabilizan de los textos publicados en la RBGN.

La RBGN adopta el modelo de licencia CC-BY Creative Commons Attribution 4.0, permitiendo la redistribución y reutilización de los artículos garantizando que la autoría esté debidamente acreditada.