Resumen
Purpose – To investigate how authentic leaders influence their followers' well-being at work and to examine the roles of the leader's affective presence and interactional justice in the relationship between authentic leadership and job satisfaction in the financial sector.
Theoretical framework – Grounded in the authentic leadership perspective and informed by affective social exchange theory, the study develops hypotheses regarding the roles of the leader's positive affective presence and interactional justice in promoting their followers' well-being.
Design/methodology/approach – The study employs a quantitative survey design to examine the proposed relationships between authentic leadership, the leader's positive affective presence, interactional justice, and job satisfaction. Validated scales were used to measure each construct, and statistical analyses were conducted to assess direct and mediating effects within the proposed model.
Findings – Authentic leadership is positively associated with the leader's positive affective presence, and both predict interactional justice. Positive affective presence and fair interactions mediate the relationship between authentic leadership and job satisfaction.
Practical and social implications – The study provides novel evidence on the connections between authentic leadership, the leader's affective presence, and interactional justice in predicting job satisfaction, suggesting that the development of authentic leadership capacities can foster a more positive and fair work environment, thereby enhancing quality of work life.
Originality/value – The study expands the understanding of the psychosocial mechanisms through which authenticity-based leadership styles promote well-being at work. It offers a more comprehensive explanation of the affective and relational processes that support healthy, emotionally high-quality organizational environments.
Citas
Abelha, D. M., Carneiro, P. C., & Cavazotte, F. D. (2018). Transformational Leadership and Job Satisfaction: Assessing the Influence of Organizational Contextual Factors and Individual Characteristics. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 20(4), 516-532. https://doi.org/10.7819/ rbgn.v0i0.3949.
Avolio, B. J., Bass, B. M., & Jung, D. I. (1999). Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72(4), 441-462. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317999166789.
Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Walumbwa, F. O., Luthans, F., & May, D. R. (2004). Unlocking the mask: A look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(6), 801-823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.003.
Baron, R., & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173- 1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173. PMid:3806354.
Bartels, A. L., Nahrgang, J. D., Sessions, H., Wilson, K. S., Wu, L., & Law‐Penrose, J. (2022). With a frown or a smile: How leader affective states spark the leader‐follower reciprocal exchange process. Personnel Psychology, 75(1), 147-177. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12445.
Bass, B. M., & Steidlmeier, P. (1999). Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 181-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S1048-9843(99)00016-8.
Bedeian, A. G., Ferris, G. R., & Kacmar, K. M. (1992). Age, tenure, and job satisfaction: A tale of two perspectives. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 40(1), 33-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(92)90045-2.
Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations (pp. 43-55). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Campos, M. I., & Rueda, F. (2021). Escala de Avaliação do Líder Autêntico: Confiabilidade e diferenças entre grupos. Revista Psicologia Organizações e Trabalho, 21(3), 1638-1646.
Cavazotte, F., Mansur, J., & Moreno, V. (2021). Authentic leadership and sustainable operations: How leader morality and selflessness can foster frontline safety performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 313, 127819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127819.
Cha, S. E., Hewlin, P. F., Roberts, L. M., Buckman, B. R., Leroy, H., Steckler, E. L., Ostermeier, K., & Cooper, D. (2019). Being your true self at work: Integrating the fragmented research on authenticity in organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 13(2), 633-671. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0108.
Chang, S. J., van Witteloostuijn, A., & Eden, L. (2010). From the editors: Common method variance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(2), 178-184. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.88.
Cropanzano, R., & Greenberg, J. (1997). Progress in organizational justice: Tunneling through the maze. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 317-372). New York: Wiley & Sons. Dal Vesco, G., Beuren, I. M., & Popik, F. (2016). Percepção de justiça na avaliação de desempenho e satisfação do trabalho. Enfoque: Reflexão Contábil, 35(3), 121-138. https://doi.org/10.4025/enfoque.v35i3.28333.
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499-512. https:// doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499. PMid:11419809.
Dobrow, S. R., Ganzach, Y., & Liu, Y. (2018). Time and job satisfaction: A longitudinal study of the differential roles of age and tenure. Journal of Management, 44(7), 2558-2579. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315624962.
Erdogan, B., & Enders, J. (2007). Support from the top: Supervisors’ perceived organizational support as a moderator of leader–member exchange to satisfaction and performance relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 321–330.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., & Lang, A. B. A. A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149– 1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
Fox S., Spector P. E., Miles D. (2001). Counterproductive work behavior (CWB) in response to job stressors and organizational justice: Some mediator and moderator tests for autonomy and emotions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59, 291-309.
Gardner, W. L., Cogliser, C. C., Davis, K. M., & Dickens, M. P. (2011). Authentic leadership: A review of the literature and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(6), 1120–1145.
Gardner, W. L., Karam, E. P., Alvesson, M., & Einola, K. (2021). Authentic leadership: The case for and against. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(6),
Gardner, W. L., Karam, E. P., Noghani, F., Cogliser, C. C., Gullifor, D. P., Mhatre, K., ... & Dahunsi, D. (2024). ‘Let’s get real’… when we lead: A systematic review, critical assessment, and agenda for authentic leadership theory and research. Journal of Management & Organization, 1-27.
Gardner, W. L., & McCauley, K. D. (2022a). The gaslighting of authentic leadership. Leadership, 18(6), 801–813.
Gardner, W. L., & McCauley, K. D. (2022b). The gaslighting of authentic leadership revisited. Leadership, 18(6), 832–840.
George, B. (2003). Authentic leadership: Rediscovering the secrets to creating lasting value (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Gill, C. & Caza, A. (2015). An Investigation of Authentic Leadership's Individual and Group Influences on Follower Responses. Journal of Management. 44.
Gooty, J., Connelly, S., Griffith, J., & Gupta, A. (2010). Leadership and affect: A state of science review. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 979-1004.
Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16(2), 399-432.
Greenberg, J. (1993). Justice and organizational citizenship: A commentary on the state of the science. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 6, 249-256.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). The job diagnostic survey: An instrument for the diagnosis of jobs and the evaluation of job redesign projects. Department of Administrative Sciences: Yale University.
Hill, R. C., Griffiths, W. E., & Lim, G. C. (2018). Principles of econometrics (5th ed.). Wiley.
Hodson, R., Creighton, S., Jamison, C. S., Rieble, S., & Welsh, S. (1994). Loyalty to Whom? Workplace Participation and the Development of Consent. Human Relations, 47(8), 895-909.
Howell, J. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1992). The Ethics of Charismatic Leadership: Submission or Liberation? Academy of Management Executive, 6(2).
Hughes, D. J., Lee, A., Tian, A. W., Newman, A., & Legood, A. (2018). Leadership, creativity, and innovation: A critical review and practical recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(5), 549-569.
Johnson, S. K. (2009). Do you feel what I feel? Mood contagion and leadership outcomes.
The Leadership Quarterly, 20(5), 814-827.
Judge, T. A., & Klinger, R. (2008). Job satisfaction: Subjective well-being at work. In Eid, M. & Larsen, R. The Science of Subjective Well-Being. New York, NC: The Guilford Press.
Judge, T. A., Weiss, H. M., Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D., & Hulin, C. L. (2017). Job attitudes, job satisfaction, and job affect: A century of continuity and of change. Journal of applied psychology, 102(3), 356.
Lawler, E. J. (2001). An affect theory of social exchange. American journal of sociology, 107(2), 321-352.
Lombard, E., & Gibson Brandon, R. N. (2024). Do wealth managers understand codes of conduct and their ethical dilemmas? Lessons from an online survey. Journal of Business Ethics, 189(3), 553–572.
Luthans, F., & Avolio, B. J. (2003). Authentic leadership development. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship (pp. 241-258). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Lux, A. A., & Lowe, K. B. (2025). Authentic leadership: 20-Year review editorial. Journal of Management & Organization.
Madera, J. M., & Smith, D. B. (2009). The effects of leader negative emotions on evaluations of leadership in a crisis situation: The role of anger and sadness. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(2), 103–114.
Madrid, H. P., Totterdell, P., Niven, K., & Barros, E. (2016). Leader affective presence and innovation in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(5), 673–686
Madrid, H. P., Vasquez, C. A., and Escaffi-Schwarz, M. (2024), “Leader affective presence, psychological safety and team proactive problem prevention.” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12480.
Mardanov, I. T., Heischmidt, K., & Henson, A. (2008). Leader-member exchange and job satisfaction bond and predicted employee turnover. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 15(2), 159–175.
Meier, L. L., Keller, A. C., Reis, D., & Nohe, C. (2023). On the asymmetry of losses and gains: Implications of changing work conditions for well-being. Journal of Applied Psychology, 108(8), 1408.
Michie, S., & Gooty, J. (2005). Values, emotions, and authenticity: Will the real leader please stand up? The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 441-457.
Neider, L. L., & Schriesheim, C. A. (2011). The Authentic Leadership Inventory (ALI): Development and empirical tests. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(6), 1146-1164.
Pedroso, B., Kovaleski, A., Ferreira, C., Pilatt, L., Gutierrez, G. & Picinin, C. (2014). Desenvolvimento e validação da versão brasileira do Diagnóstico do Trabalho (Job Diagnostic Survey) de Hackman e Oldham. Gestão & Produção. 21. 285-301.
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544.
Rego, A. (2000). Justiça e comportamentos de cidadania. Comportamento Organizacional e Gestão, 6(1), 73-94.
Ribeiro, N., Duarte, A., Filipe, R., & Torres de Oliveira, R. (2020). How Authentic Leadership Promotes Individual Creativity: The Mediating Role of Affective Commitment. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 27(2), 189-202.
Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp.290-312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Turano, L., & Cavazotte, F. (2023). Are principled leaders always considered effective? The role of followers’ business area. In 47º Encontro da ANPAD, São Paulo. Anais eletrônicos. Maringá: Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração.
United Nations Global Compact. (2021). UN Global Compact Strategy 2021–2023.
Van Knippenberg, D., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2016). Leadership and affect: Moving the hearts and minds of followers. The Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 799-840.
Vesco, D. G., Beuren, I. M., & Popik, F. (2016). Percepção de justiça na avaliação de desempenho e satisfação do trabalho. Enfoque: Reflexão Contábil, 35(3), 121-138.
World Economic Forum. (2022). Addressing employee burnout: Are you solving the right problem? World Economic Forum Agenda.
Una vez aprobada la publicación del artículo, el/los autor/es cede/n los derechos de copyright a la Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios – RBGN.
Es OBLIGATORIO que los autores envíen a la RBGN el formulario de Cesión de Derechos de Autor debidamente cumplimentado y firmado según el modelo: [Derechos de autor]
Las condiciones de la Cesión de Derechos de Autor indican que la Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios – RBGN goza a título gratuito y en carácter definitivo de los derechos de autor patrimoniales de los artículos publicados por ella. A pesar de la Cesión de los Derechos de Autor, la RBGN faculta a los autores al uso de estos derechos sin restricciones.
Los autores se responsabilizan de los textos publicados en la RBGN.
La RBGN adopta el modelo de licencia CC-BY Creative Commons Attribution 4.0, permitiendo la redistribución y reutilización de los artículos garantizando que la autoría esté debidamente acreditada.

