Keywords
innovation
acquired academic characteristics
board members
CEOs
How to Cite
Abstract
Purpose – We aim to verify if and how top management’s acquired academic characteristics help firms withstand crises by examining the effect of CEOs’ and board members’ education and scholar expertise on financial resilience through innovation.
Theoretical framework – We draw upon upper echelons, agency and information asymmetry theories.
Design/methodology/approach – We collect data for the Brazilian stock market during the COVID-19 pandemic to allow observation in times of crisis. Using a unique dataset of academic curricula, we estimate OLS and Cox regressions to reach our goal and examine the stability and flexibility of firms during the pandemic. We perform robustness checks through quantile regression to provide more evidence for our findings.
Findings – We find that top managements’ acquired academic characteristics have an impact on financial resilience. This relationship is sometimes moderated by innovation. Overall, innovation and top managements’ acquired academic characteristics seem advantageous during a crisis with their interaction boosting these relationships.
Research Practical & Social implications – This study provides evidence of the importance of top management to yet another organizational outcome, i.e. resilience. Our contributions are both theoretical and empirical as we advance in the discussions about financial resilience, corporate governance and innovation while we deliver insights to practitioners and policymakers.
Originality/value – We are the first to uncover some of the determinants of financial resilience in Brazil whose stock market tends to be more sensitive to shocks than that of more developed countries. Our study provides guidance to both investors and managers.
References
Abatecola, G., & Cristofaro, M. (2020). Hambrick and Mason’s “Upper Echelons Theory”: evolution and open avenues. Journal of Management History, 26(1), 116–136. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMH-02-2018-0016
Adams, M., & Jiang, W. (2020). Do Financial Experts on the Board Matter? An Empirical Test From the United Kingdom’s Non-Life Insurance Industry. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 35(1), 168–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X17705201
Armeanu, D. Ş., Vintilă, G., Gherghina, Ş. C., & Petrache, D. C. (2017). Approaches on correlation between board of directors and risk management in resilient economies. Sustainability, 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020173
Brandão, I. F., & Crisóstomo, V. L. (2024). Shareholding control, corporate governance and debt financing of Brazilian companies. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 26(4), e20240007. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v26i4.4276
Brandão, I. F., Crisóstomo, V. L. & López-Iturriaga, F.J. (2024). A multidimensional analysis of corporate governance and firm value. Journal of Management and Governance 28, 985–1016. https://doi-org/10.1007/s10997-024-09699-8
Buyl, T., Boone, C., & Wade, J. B. (2019). CEO Narcissism, Risk-Taking, and Resilience: An Empirical Analysis in U.S. Commercial Banks. Journal of Management, 45(4), 1372–1400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317699521
Chen, I. J., Lin, W. C., Lo, H. C., & Chen, S. S. (2023). Board diversity and corporate innovation. In Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting (Vol. 61, Issue 1). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-023-01145-4
Chindasombatcharoen, P., Chatjuthamard, P., Jiraporn, P., & Treepongkaruna, S. (2023). Director age and corporate innovation: Evidence from textual analysis. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 37, 100779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2022.100779
da Silva, R. B., Klotzle, M. C., Pinto, A. C. F., & da Motta, L. F. J. (2018). R&D investment and risk in Brazil. Global Finance Journal, 35, 106–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.08.003
De Vilhena, F. A. C., & Camargos, M. A. (2015). Governança Corporativa, Criação De Valor E Desempenho Econômico-Financeiro: Evidências Do Mercado Brasileiro Com Dados em Painel, 2005-2011. Revista de Gestão, 22(1), 77–96. https://doi.org/10.5700/rege552
DesJardine, M., Bansal, P., & Yang, Y. (2019). Bouncing Back: Building Resilience Through Social and Environmental Practices in the Context of the 2008 Global Financial Crisis. Journal of Management, 45(4), 1434–1460. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317708854
Ding, W., Levine, R., Lin, C., & Xie, W. (2021). Corporate immunity to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Financial Economics, 141(2), 802–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.03.005
Dong, Y., Duan, T., Hou, W., & Liu, Y. (Lucy). (2019). Athletes in boardrooms: Evidence from the world. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 59, 165–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2018.12.009
Engelen, A., Huesker, C., Rieger, V., & Berg, V. (2024). Building a resilient organization through a pre-shock strategic emphasis on innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 41(1), 36–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12697
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of Ownership and Control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2). http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/t-and-c
Fávero, L. P., & Belfiore, P. (2017). Manual de Análise de Dados: Estatística e Modelagem Multivariada com Excel, SPSS e Stata (1st ed.). Elsevier.
Fayyaz, U. E. R., Jalal, R. N. U. D., Venditti, M., & Minguez-Vera, A. (2023). Diverse boards and firm performance: The role of environmental, social and governance disclosure. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(3), 1457–1472. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2430
Fraga, J. B., & Silva, V. A. B. (2012). Board diversity and firm performance: an empirical investigation in the Brazilian market. Brazilian Business Review, 9(Special Ed), 55–77. https://doi.org/10.15728/bbrconf.2012.3
Freitas, M. R. de O., Pereira, G. M., De Vasconcelos, A. C., & De Luca, M. M. M. (2020). Concentração acionária, conselho de administração e remuneração de executivos. RAE- Revista de Administração de Empresas, 60(5), 322–335.
Gaur, S. S., Bathula, H., & Singh, D. (2015). Ownership Concentration, Board Characteristics and Firm Performance. Management Decision, 53(5), 911–931.
Gittell, J. H., Cameron, K., Lim, S., & Rivas, V. (2006). Relationships, Layoffs, and organizational resilience: Airline industry responses to september 11. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 42(3), 300–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886306286466
Habtoor, O. S. (2022). Board Attributes and Bank Performance in Light of Saudi Corporate Governance Regulations. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15100441
Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper Echelons Theory: An Update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334–343.
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers^. In Management Review (Vol. 9, Issue 2).
Jacques, K. A. S., Lemes, S., Fávero, L. P. L., & Rodrigues, L. M. P. L. (2023). Composition of the board of directors and the probability of disclosure of social responsibility reports. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 25(4), p.516-532. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v25i4.4240
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, William H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Jensen, M. C., & Murphy, K. J. (1990). Performance pay and top-management incentives. Journal of political economy, 98(2), 225-264. https://doi.org/10.1086/261677
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R.W. (2000). Agency problems and dividend policies around the world. Journal of Finance, 55, 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00199
Li, J., Ma, Y., Shi, B., & Yang, Y. (2022). Can the Market Recognize the Value of the Corporate Governance Mechanism of Chinese Listed Companies? —Empirical Evidence From COVID-19. Frontiers in Public Health, 9(January), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.812253
Martins, T.C. & Novaes, W. (2012). Mandatory dividend rules: Do they make it harder for firms to invest? Journal of Corporate Finance, 18, 953-967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2012.05.002
Mellado-Garcia, E., Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N., & Aragon-Correa, J. A. (2024). Avoiding relapses after crises: Exploring the influence of firm investors’ characteristics on organizational resilience. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/23409444241243377
Naseem, M. A., Lin, J., Rehman, R. ur, Ahmad, M. I., & Ali, R. (2020). Does capital structure mediate the link between CEO characteristics and firm performance? Management Decision, 58(1), 164–181. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2018-0594
Pereira, B. D. S., Theiss, V., Lunkes, R. J., Schnorrenberger, D., & Gasparetto, V. (2016). Relação entre as características observáveis dos CEOs e a remuneração. Contabilidad y Negocios, 11(21), 5-24.
Perlin, M., Kirch, G., & Vancin, D. (2019). Accessing financial reports and corporate events with getdfpdata. Brazilian Review of Finance, 17(3), 85–108.
Perlin, M., Kirch, G., Vancin, D., & Mastella, M. (2021). The impact of academic titles of board member and directors over the performance of companies traded at B3. Brazilian Business Review, 18(5), 561–584. https://doi.org/10.15728/BBR.2021.18.5.5
Peterson, C. A., & Philpot, J. (2009). Roles of academic directors on US Fortune 500 boards. Corporate Governance, 9(2), 202–215. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700910946631
Pinheiro, B. G., Vasconcelos, A. C. de, De Luca, M. M. M., & Crisóstomo, V. L. (2017). Estrutura de Capital e Governança Corporativa nas Empresas Listadas na BM&FBovespa. Revista de Educação e Pesquisa Em Contabilidade (REPeC), 11(4), 451–466. https://doi.org/10.17524/repec.v11i4.1706
Pinheiro, A.B., do Prado, N.B., Moraes, G.H.S.M.D. and Carraro, W.B.W.H. (2024), "Corporate reputation in Brazil: do board characteristics matter?", RAUSP Management Journal, 59(4), 350-365. https://doi-org/10.1108/RAUSP-01-2024-0002
Sajko, M., Boone, C., & Buyl, T. (2021). CEO Greed, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Organizational Resilience to Systemic Shocks. Journal of Management, 47(4), 957–992. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320902528
Sampaio, T. S. L., Crisóstomo, V. L., Brandão, I. F., & Pinheiro, B. G. (2024). Subsidized debt, corporate governance, and ownership concentration of Brazilian firms. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 26(2), e20230045. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v26i02.4266
Shahid, M. S., & Abbas, M. (2019). Does corporate governance play any role in investor confidence, corporate investment decisions relationship? Evidence from Pakistan and India. Journal of Economics and Business, 105(March), 105839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2019.03.003
Sidki, M., Boerger, L., & Boll, D. (2024). The effect of board members’ education and experience on the financial performance of German state-owned enterprises. Journal of Management and Governance, 28(2), 445–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-022-09663-4
Stein, J. (2003) Agency, information and corporate investment, In: Constantinides, G.M., Harris, M., Stulz, R. (Eds.): Handbook of the Economics of Finance (Elsevier, Amsterdam).
Teixeira, E. de O., & Werther, W. B. (2013). Resilience: Continuous renewal of competitive advantages. Business Horizons, 56(3), 333–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2013.01.009
Torres, P., & Augusto, M. (2021). Attention to social issues and CEO duality as enablers of resilience to exogenous shocks in the tourism industry. Tourism Management, 87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104400
Tristão, P. A., & Sonza, I. B. (2023). IS THE DUAL-CLASS UNIFICATION A GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICE? EVIDENCE FROM BRAZILIAN COMPANIES. Boletim de Conjuntura, 14(42), 467–480.
Wang, Q., Wu, Q., Xie, L., & Zhang, X. (2023). CEO’s self-oriented perfectionism, strategic decision comprehensiveness and firm resilience. Management Decision, 61(11), 3343–3360. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-12-2022-1656
Wu, H., Zhang, K., & Li, R. (2024). ESG score, analyst coverage and corporate resilience. Finance Research Letters, 62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105248
Xia, Y., Qiao, Z., & Xie, G. (2022). Corporate resilience to the COVID-19 pandemic: The role of digital finance. Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2022.101791
Yang, C., Wang, J., & David, L. K. (2023). The same or different? How optimal distinctiveness in corporate social responsibility affects organizational resilience during COVID-19. Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12627
Zhang, N., Bo, L., & Wang, X. (2024). The power of scholar: CEO academic experience and corporate debt default risk. Applied Economics. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2024.2364942
If a paper is approved for publication, its copyright has to be transferred by the author(s) to the Review of Business Management – RBGN.
Accordingly, authors are REQUIRED to send RBGN a duly completed and signed Copyright Transfer Form. Please refer to the following template: [Copyright Transfer]
The conditions set out by the Copyright Transfer Form state that the Review of Business Management – RBGN owns, free of charge and permanently, the copyright of the papers it publishes. Although the authors are required to sign the Copyright Transfer Form, RBGN allows authors to hold and use their own copyright without restrictions.
The texts published by RBGN are the sole responsibility of their authors.
The review has adopted the CC-BY Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 allowing redistribution and reuse of papers on condition that the authorship is properly credited.