Palavras-chave
desempenho inovador
capacidades de socialização
tomada de decisões
Como Citar
Resumo
Objetivo – Este estudo tem como objetivo analisar a influência do conflito dentro da equipe de alta administração (TMT) no desempenho inovador. Ele considera os papéis moderadores das capacidades de socialização e da tomada de decisões descentralizada, abordando uma lacuna teórica e empírica na literatura.
Referencial Teórico – Este estudo examina a relação entre o conflito dentro da equipe de gestão e o desempenho inovador. Ele diferencia o conflito de tarefas do conflito de relacionamento e explora o papel moderador das capacidades de socialização e da descentralização.
Metodologia – Adotou-se uma abordagem quantitativa para estimar três modelos teóricos que permitem avaliar as relações entre o conflito na TMT e a inovação. Esses modelos são baseados em dados coletados em organizações de vários setores.
Resultados – Os resultados mostram que o conflito de tarefas afeta positivamente o desempenho inovador, enquanto o conflito de relacionamento o afeta negativamente.
Implicações práticas e sociais da pesquisa – Para fortalecer a liderança da TMT, recomenda-se implementar programas para aprimorar as habilidades interpessoais e fomentar a confiança e a comunicação. Além disso, aconselha-se adotar estruturas descentralizadas que facilitem a inovação.
Originalidade – Este estudo oferece uma abordagem inovadora ao analisar a interação entre fatores internos da TMT e fatores estruturais organizacionais.
Referências
A. Jehn, K., & Mannix, E. A. (2001). The Dynamic Nature of Conflict: A Longitudinal Study of Intragroup Conflict and Group Performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 238–251. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069453
Auh, S., & Menguc, B. (2005). The influence of top management team functional diversity on strategic orientations: The moderating role of environmental turbulence and inter-functional coordination. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 22(3), 333–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2015.08.003
Bachrach, D. G., Guedes, M. J., Harms, P. D., & Patel, P. C. (2022). CEO narcissism, top management team transactive memory systems, and firm performance: an upper echelons perspective on CEO admiration and rivalry narcissism. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WORK AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 31(1), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2021.1926989
Bantel, K., & Jackson, S. E. (1989). Top Management and Innovations in Banking : Does the Composition of the Top Team Make a Difference ? Strategic Management Journal, 10, 107–124.
Batarseh, F. S., Daspit, J. J., & Usher, J. M. (2018). The collaboration capability of global virtual teams: relationships with functional diversity, absorptive capacity, and innovation. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 13(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/17509653.2016.1275865
Bedford, D. S., Bisbe, J., & Sweeney, B. (2022). The joint effects of performance measurement system design and TMT cognitive conflict on innovation ambidexterity. Management Accounting Research, 57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2022.100805
Chen, J., & Liu, L. (2020). Reconciling temporal conflicts in innovation ambidexterity: the role of TMT temporal leadership. JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 24(8), 1899–1920. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2019-0555
Chen, J., & Liu, L. (2024). TMT entrepreneurial passion diversity and firm innovation performance: the mediating role of knowledge creation. JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 28(1), 268–291. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-12-2022-0961
Chen, M., & Wang, F. (2021). Effects of top management team faultlines in the service transition of manufacturing firms. INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 98, 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.08.001
Chen, W., Chen, C., & Xiong, X. (2023). Top management team faultlines and corporate industrial diversification: The mediating role of strategic attentional breadth. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1102192
Cortes-Mejia, S., Cortes, A. F., & Herrmann, P. (2022). Sharing Strategic Decisions: CEO Humility, TMT Decentralization, and Ethical Culture. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 178(1), 241–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04766-8
Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational Innovation: a Meta-Analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555–590. https://doi.org/10.2307/256406
Ensley, M. D., Pearson, A. W., & Amason, A. C. (2002). Understanding the dynamics of new venture top management teams: Cohesion, conflict, and new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(4), 365–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00065-3
García-Granero, A., Fernández-Mesa, A., Jansen, J. J. P., & Vega-Jurado, J. (2017). Top management team diversity and ambidexterity: The contingent role of shared responsibility and CEO cognitive trust. Long Range Planning, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.11.001
Hashmi, H. B. A., Voinea, C. L., Caniels, M. C. J., Ooms, W., & Abbass, K. (2023). Do top management team diversity and chief sustainability officer make firms greener? Moderating role of top management team behavioral integration. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 31(4), 2536–2547. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2529
He, Z.-L., & Wong, P.-K. (2004). Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481–494. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0078
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations (2nd ed.). Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Hu, Z., Hu, M., Yuan, X., Yu, H., Zou, J., Zhang, Y., & Lu, Z. (2022). Verbal learning, working memory, and attention/vigilance may be candidate phenotypes of bipolar II depression in Chinese Han nationality. ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103563
Huang, H., & Hao, S. (2024). Enterprise digital transformation and sustainable development performance: The asymmetric roles of top management team faultlines. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3198
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1993). r-sub(wg): An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(2), 306–309. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.78.2.306
Jansen, J. J. P., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661–1674. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576
Kanchanabha, B., & Badir, Y. F. (2021). Top management Team ? s cognitive diversity and the Firm ? s ambidextrous innovation capability: The mediating role of ambivalent interpretation. TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101499
Kumar, A. (2023). Leadership and decision-making: Top management team age demographic and environmental strategy. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT & ORGANIZATION, 29(1), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2019.91
Kwan, H. K., Wang, Y., Wu, X., & Ouyang, X. (2024). CEO family harmony and firm product innovation performance: A moderated mediation model of the CEO-TMT interface. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT & ORGANIZATION. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2024.22
Lakshman, C., & Gonzalez, J. (2023). From TMT multiculturalism to strategic agility: business model innovation in MNEs. Multinational Business Review, 31(2), 157 – 175. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBR-02-2022-0030
Le, Y., Wan, J., Wang, G., Bai, J., & Zhang, B. (2020). Exploring the missing link between top management team characteristics and megaproject performance. ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURAL MANAGEMENT, 27(5), 1039–1064. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-12-2018-0566
Li, M., & Liu, K. (Carl). (2022). Let’s explore with a divided team! The effects of top management team demographic faultlines on technological exploration. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT & ORGANIZATION, 28(6), 1181–1200. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2019.87
Liu, A., Liu, H., Gu, J., Chen, M., & Jin, C. (2023). Business Model Implementation of New Ventures: Linking TMT Process Antecedents, Organizational Culture, and Firm Performance. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587231198428
Liu, A., Liu, H., Gu, J., Chen, M., & Jin, C. (2024). Business Model Implementation of New Ventures: Linking TMT Process Antecedents, Organizational Culture, and Firm Performance. ENTREPRENEURSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE, 48(3), 826–855. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587231198428
Liu, J., Fu, P., & Liu, S. (2009). Conflicts in top management teams and team/firm outcomes: The moderating effects of conflict-handling approaches. International Journal of Conflict Management, 20(3), 228–250. https://doi.org/10.1108/10444060910974867
Lu, C., Liu, Z., Xu, Y., Liao, S., & Fu, L. (2021). How TMT diversity influences open innovation: an empirical study on biopharmaceutical firms in China. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1892056
Ma, J., & Huang, X. (2023). TMT experience and corporate social (ir)responsibility: the moderating effects of faultlines. Nankai Business Review International, 14(4), 675 – 697. https://doi.org/10.1108/NBRI-12-2021-0087
Medina, M. N., Ramachandran, I., & Daspit, J. J. (2018). Collaboration or Clash? Mapping the Effects of Top Management Team Conflict on Firm Absorptive Capacity. International Journal of Innovation Management, 1950023, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919619500233
Mihalache, O. R., Jansen, J. J. P., Van den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. . (2014). Top management team shared leadership and organizational ambidexterity: amoderated mediation framework. Strateg. Entrepreneursh, 8(6), 128–148. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej
Narayan, S., Sidhu, J. S., & Volberda, H. W. (2021). From Attention to Action: The Influence of Cognitive and Ideological Diversity in Top Management Teams on Business Model Innovation. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 58(8, SI), 2082–2110. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12668
Park, S. Y., & Kim, Y. S. (2020). Correlations between Construction Firm Value and Top Management Characteristics. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 36(2). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000728
Peng, C., & Jia, X. (2023). Influence of top management team faultlines on corporate digitalization. JOURNAL OF ENTERPRISE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-09-2022-0302
Sanchez, J., & Amo, E. (2004). Acuerdo intragrupal: una aplicacion a la evaluacion de la cultura de los equipos de trabajo [Analysing the within-group agreement: An application to evaluate the culture of work teams]. Psicothema, 16(1), 88–93. http://www.psicothema.com/pdf/1166.pdf
She, Z., Li, Q., London, M., Yang, B., & Yang, B. (2020). Effects of CEO narcissism on decision-making comprehensiveness and speed. JOURNAL OF MANAGERIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 35(1), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-01-2019-0042
Simons, T. L., & Peterson, R. S. (2000). Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams -The pivotal role of intragroup trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.102
Sperber, S., & Linder, C. (2016). The impact of top management teams on firm innovativeness: a configurational analysis of demographic characteristics, leadership style and team power distribution. Review of Managerial Science, 12(1), 285–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-016-0222-z
Sutarti, Syakhroza, A., Diyanty, V., & Dewo, S. A. (2021). Top management team (TMT) age diversity and firm performance: the moderating role of the effectiveness of TMT meetings. TEAM PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 27(5–6), 486–503. https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-01-2021-0006
Talke, K., Salomo, S., & Kock, A. (2011). Top management team diversity and strategic innovation orientation: The relationship and consequences for innovativeness and performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(6), 819–832. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00851.x
Talke, Katrin, Salomo, S., & Rost, K. (2010). How top management team diversity affects innovativeness and performance via the strategic choice to focus on innovation fields. Research Policy, 39(7), 907–918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.04.001
Tran, T. M. T., Yuen, K. F., Li, K. X., Balci, G., & Ma, F. (2020). A theory-driven identification and ranking of the critical success factors of sustainable shipping management. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118401
Tsui, A. S. C., Lee, B., & Yau, O. H. M. (2022). The impact of executive board gender diversity, R&D investment, marketing expenses on company performance in the healthcare industry. Journal of Transnational Management, 27(1), 3–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475778.2022.2051397
Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., Volberda, H. W., & De Boer, M. (1999). Coevolution of Firm Absorptive Capacity and Knowledge Environment: Organizational Forms and Combinative Capabilities. Organization Science, 10(5), 551–568. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.5.551
Vega-Jurado, J., Schmutzler, J., & Manjarrés-Henríquez, L. Vega-Cárcamo, J. (2019). Orchestrating absorptive capacity: organizational catalysts of TMT’s influence. Management Research, 17(4), 426–444. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/MRJIAM-12-2018-0892
Vega-Jurado, Jaider, Polo-Otero, J. L., Cotes-Torres, M. A., & Vega-Cárcamo, J. C. (2017). Firm’s knowledge base and its impact on absorptive capacity in low-tech SMEs. Cuadernos de Administracion, 30(55), 7–35. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.cao30-55.bcica
Vega-Jurado, Jaider, Schmutzler, J., Manjarrés-Henríquez, L., & Vega-Cárcamo, J. (2019). Orchestrating absorptive capacity: organizational catalysts of TMT’s influence. Management Research, 17(4), 426–444. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRJIAM-12-2018-0892
Venugopal, A., Krishnan, T. N., Upadhyayula, R. S., & Kumar, M. (2020). Finding the microfoundations of organizational ambidexterity - Demystifying the role of top management behavioural integration. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 106, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.049
Wang, D., Su, Z., & Guo, H. (2019). Top management team conflict and exploratory innovation: The mediating impact of market orientation. Industrial Marketing Management, 82(January), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.02.014
Wang, L., Zeng, T., & Li, C. (2022). Behavior decision of top management team and enterprise green technology innovation. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133120
Wiersema, M. F., & Bantel, K. A. (1992). Top Management Team Demography and Corporate Strategic Change. Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 91–121. https://doi.org/10.5465/256474
Wong, E. M., Ormiston, M. E., & Tetlock, P. E. (2011). The effects of top management team integrative complexity and decentralized decision making on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 54(6), 1207–1228. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.0762
Wu, L., & Yang, J. (2025). How does tolerance culture affect organizational agility? The moderating effect of top management team diversity. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 36(3-4), 324-344.
Xie, X., Han, Y., & Hoang, T. T. (2022). Can green process innovation improve both financial and environmental performance? The roles of TMT heterogeneity and ownership. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122018
Xu, Z. (2024). Will CEO-TMT Overseas Experience Differences Reduce Innovation Investment? Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Listed Companies. JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 15(1), 771–800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01103-4
Yang, X., & Shao, Y. (2023). How does TMT heterogeneity affect breakthrough innovation? The moderating effect of strategic decision-making logics. European Journal of Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-11-2022-0613
Yao, C.-L., & Wang, L.-Y. (2024). Corporate sustainable development performance through top management team’s transactive memory system and organizational resilience: A moderated mediation analysis. HELIYON, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24674
Yi, Y., Chen, Y., & He, X. (2022). CEO Leadership, Strategic Decision Comprehensiveness, and Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of TMT Cognitive Conflict. Management and Organization Review, 18(1), 131 – 166. https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2021.10
Zhang, Z., Wang, D., & Sun, W. (2022). TMT conflict, organizational structure, and entrepreneurial orientation: An attention-based view. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 38(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2022.101231
Zhou, L., Huang, H., Chen, X., & Tian, F. (2023). Functional diversity of top management teams and firm performance in SMEs: a social network perspective. REVIEW OF MANAGERIAL SCIENCE, 17(1), 259–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00524-w
Zhou, Y., Zhu, H., Zhu, L., Liu, G., & Zou, Y. (2023). Be close to government and academy: TMT social capital, network prestige and firm’s innovation performance. Chinese Management Studies, 17(6), 1194 – 1216. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-03-2021-0109
Em caso de aprovação do artigo para publicação, os direitos de copyright são cedidos pelo(s) autor(es) à Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios – RBGN.
Nestes termos, é OBRIGATÓRIO que os autores enviem para RBGN o formulário de Cessão de Direitos Autorias devidamente preenchido e assinado. Conforme o modelo: [Direitosautorais]
As condições da Cessão de Direitos Autorais indicam que a Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios – RBGN possui a título gratuito e em caráter definitivo os direitos autorais patrimoniais dos artigos por ela publicados. Não obstante a Cessão dos Direitos Autorais, a RBGN faculta aos autores o uso desses direitos sem restrições.
Os textos publicados na RBGN são de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores.
A revista adota o padrão de licença CC-BY Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 permitindo redistribuição e reutilização dos artigos sob a condição de que a autoria seja devidamente creditada.