Abstract
Purpose – The hospitality sector has undergone substantial changes in terms of its job requirements and the need for work engagement practices. This study investigates the relationships between meaningful work, work engagement, employee performance, and task interdependence in India’s hospitality sector.
Theoretical framework – The theoretical framework is based on Kahn’s (1990) work engagement framework and Bakker and Demerouti’s (2007) Job-Demand Resources (JD-R) model.
Design/methodology/approach – Hypotheses were tested statistically using structural equation modeling (SEM) with a cross-sectional sample of 301 hospitality sector employees in four Indian cities.
Findings – The results highlight the crucial role of meaningful work and engagement in achieving sustained performance outcomes. Work engagement was found to be a significant mediator in the model. However, task interdependence did not have a statistically significant moderating effect. While age showed no significant influence on job performance, work experience emerged as a significant predictor of performance.
Practical and social implications of the research – The study provides substantial evidence of the critical role that meaningful work and work engagement play in driving job performance in the hospitality sector. Enhancing meaningfulness and nurturing engagement collectively form a practical roadmap for achieving superior service performance in hospitality organizations.
Originality/value – Since little research has been conducted on hospitality sector employees, this study offers empirical support for engagement-based performance models within the JD-R framework. By examining hospitality sector employees, the study expands the empirical base of JD-R research beyond traditional corporate settings. It demonstrates that meaning-driven engagement mechanisms are equally important in service-oriented, high-demand environments.
References
Albrecht, S. L., Green, C. R., & Marty, A. (2021). Meaningful work, job resources, and employee engagement. Sustainability, 13(7), 4045. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13074045
Albrecht, S., Breidahl, E., & Marty, A. (2018) Organizational resources, organizational engagement climate, and employee engagement. Career Development International, 23(1), 67-85, https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-04-2017-0064
Ardianto, R. E. (2020). The effect of work experience and work discipline on the employee performance of the quality control department of PT Eunsung Indonesia. International Journal of Research and Review, 7(2), 214-218. https://doi.org/10.4444/IJRR.1002/1747
Bailey C, Madden A, Alfes K, et al. Evaluating the evidence on employee engagement and its potential benefits to NHS staff: A narrative synthesis of the literature. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2015 Jun. (Health Services and Delivery Research, No. 3.26.) Chapter 3, What is engagement? Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK299343/
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. (2023). Job Demands–Resources Theory: Ten Years Later. Annual Review Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior. 10:25-53. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-053933
Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis. University of Chicago Press.
Bhat, S., Bashir, M., & Jan, H. (2024). Work engagement and perceived job performance: Does information communication technology orientation matter? Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-07-2023-0245.
Both-Nwabuwe, J. M., Dijkstra, M. T., & Beersma, B. (2017). Sweeping the floor or putting a man on the moon: How to define and measure meaningful work. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 1658. https:// doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01658
Brass, D. J. (1981). Structural relationships, job characteristics, and worker satisfaction and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(3), 331–348. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392511
Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46(4), 823–850. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb01571.x
Chen, X., Zhang, W., & Li, Y. (2023). Age diversity and performance in knowledge-intensive teams: The role of generational inclusion. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 44(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2640
Dalkhjav, B., Munkhuu, B., & Sukhragchaa, A. (2024). Enhancing job performance in the hospitality sector: Exploring the role of employee engagement, multitasking, organizational culture, and recruiting practices. Journal of Tourism Sustainability and Wellbeing, 12 (2), 188–205. https://doi.org/10.34623/98qk-1q44
Davis, A.S., & Van der Heijden, B.I. (2023). Launching the dynamic employee engagement framework: Towards a better understanding of the phenomenon. Empl Relat Int J 45(2):421–436. https://doi.org/10.1108/er-08-2021-0338
Demerouti, E., Cropanzano, R., Bakker, A., & Leiter, M. (2010). From thought to action: employee work engagement and job performance, in Work Engagement: A Handbook of Essential Theory Research, eds A. B. Bakker and M. P. Leiter (Hove: Psychology Press), 147–163.
DMR. (June 2025). India Hospitality Industry Market. https://dimensionmarketresearch.com/report/india-hospitality-industry-market/ Accessed on 25 October 2025.
Epi, R. Sukidjo, & Riyanto, E. (2020). The effect of work motivation and work experience on employee performance. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 7. 109-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v7i8.1809
Exude Human Capital. (2024). Employee Engagement in the Hospitality Industry. https://exudehc.com/blog/employee-engagement-hospitality-industry/
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
Gede, D.U., & Huluka, A.T. (2024). Effects of employee engagement on organizational performance: Case of public universities in Ethiopia. Futur Bus J, 10, 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-024-00315-7
George, D. & Mallery, P. (2018). IBM SPSS Statistics 25 Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351033909.
Ghani, B., Zada, M., Memon, K. R., Ullah, R., Khattak, A., Han, H., Ariza-Montes, A., & Araya-Castillo, L. (2022). Challenges and Strategies for Employee Retention in the Hospitality Industry: A Review. Sustainability, 14(5), 2885. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052885
Gundlach, M. J., Zivnuska, S., & Stoner, J. S. (2006). Understanding the relationship between individualism–collectivism and team performance through an integration of social identity theory and the social relations model. Human Relations, 59(12), 1603–1632. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726706073193
Gupta, N. & Sharma, V. (2016). Exploring employee engagement--A way to better business performance. Global Business Review, 17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150916631082.
Hair, J.F. & Sarstedt, M. (2021). Factors versus composites: Guidelines for choosing the right structural equation modeling method. Project Management Journal, 50 (6), 619-624. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972819882132
Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed, a silver bullet. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
Han, Seung-Hyun, Sung, M. & Suh, B. (2020). Linking meaningfulness to work outcomes through job characteristics and work engagement. Human Resource Development International, 24(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2020.1744999.
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60. https://doi.org/10.21427/D7CF7R
HR Cloud. (June 2025). 9 HR Challenges in the Hospitality Industry. https://www.hrcloud.com/blog/9-hr-challenges-in-the-hospitality-industry Accessed on 25 October 2025
HSMAI Global. (2024). Transforming Employee Engagement in the Hospitality Industry. https://global.hsmai.org/insight/transforming-employee-engagement-in-the-hospitality-industry/
Kahn, W.A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. The Academy of Management Journal, 33 (4), 692-724. https://doi.org/10.2307/256287
Karanika-Murray, M., Van Veldhoven, M., Michaelides, G., Baguley, T., Gkiontsi, D., & Harrison, N. (2024). Curvilinear relationships between age and job performance and the role of job complexity. Work, Aging and Retirement, 10 (2), 156–173, https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waac006
Kaur, P., & Mittal, A. (2020). Meaningfulness of work and employee engagement: The role of affective commitment. The Open Psychology Journal,13, 115-122. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874350102013010115
Kaushal, R. (2024). Hospitality: A Sector on Ascendancy. https://www.cbre.co.in/insights/articles/hospitality-a-sector-on-ascendancy?utm_source=chatgpt.comAccessed on 24 September 2025
Kennedy, E. (2024). The Role of Purpose in Employee Motivation and Retention. https://thetrainingassociates.com/role-purpose-employee-motivation/Accessed on 2 May 2025
Kim, W., Han, S. J., & Park, J. (2019). Is the Role of Work Engagement Essential to Employee Performance or ‘Nice to Have’? Sustainability, 11(4), 1050. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041050
Khan, S. (2025). India’s hospitality sector poised for its most dynamic phase. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/services/hotels-/-restaurants/indias-hospitality-sector-poised-for-its-most-dynamic-phase/articleshow/124549455.cms?utm_source=chatgpt.com Accessed on 24 October 2025
Khusanova R, Kang S-W, & Choi, S.B. (2021). Work engagement among public employees: Antecedents and consequences. Frontiers in Psychology. 12:684495. https://doi.org/ 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.684495
Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: a full collinearity assessment approach. Int. J. e-Collaboration, 11 (4), 1-10, 10.4018/ijec.2015100101
Lee, Chun-Chang, Lin, Yu-hsin, Huan, Hsin-chung, Huang, Wei-wen, & Teng, Hsu-hung. (2015). The effects of task interdependence, team cooperation, and team conflict on job performance. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal. 43. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2015.43.4.529.
Lee, H., & Jung, H. S. (2021). The effect of meaningful work on employee engagement: The mediating role of perceived organizational support. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), 2085. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042085
Lee, S. H., Shin, Y., & Baek, S. I. (2017). Task characteristics and work engagement: Exploring effects of role ambiguity and ICT presenteeism. Sustainability 9:1855. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/su9101855
Li, T. N., & Wu, S. X. (2024). A cross-level study on the impact of team-based reward allocation on employees’ innovative behavior in manufacturing enterprises. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 26(3), e20230195. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v26i03.4268
Lisak, A., Harush, R., Icekson, T., & Harel, S. (2022). Team Interdependence as a Substitute for Empowering Leadership Contribution to Team Meaningfulness and Performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.637822
Mansor, F., Huzaimi, Y., Hashim, M., Muhammad, N., & Omar, N. (2023). Employee engagement and organizational performance. International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Business, 8 (50), 69 – 80. https://doi.org/10.55573/IJAFB.085006.
Martela, F., & Pessi, A. B. (2018). Significant work is about self-realization and broader purpose: Defining the key dimensions of meaningful work. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 363. https:// http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00363.
Mazzetti, G., Robledo, E., Vignoli, M., Topa, G., Guglielmi, D., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2023). Work Engagement: A meta-Analysis Using the Job Demands-Resources Model. Psychological Reports, 126(3) 1069–1107. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941211051988
Nabhan, F., & Munajat, M. (2023). The role of work engagement and organizational commitment in improving job performance. Cogent Business & Management. 10(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2235819.
Nair, S., & Mathew, J. (2022). Relationship between job stress, employee engagement and job satisfaction: a study based on women managers in 4 and 5 star hotels in India. Business Perspectives and Research, https://doi.org/10.1177/22785337221107770
Phan, A.T., Le, A.T.T., Nguyen, H.T., & Nguyen, H. (2023). Determinants of employee performance in tourism industry – mediating role of engagement and meaningfulness. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 38 (2), 243-269.
https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPQM.2023.129606
Pinjani, P., & Palvia, P. (2013). Trust and knowledge sharing in diverse global virtual teams. Inf. Manag. 50, 144–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2012.10.002
Rai, A., Kim, M., & Singh, S.K. (2023). Meaningful work from an ethics perspective: Examination of ethical antecedents and outcomes of meaningful work. Journal of Business Research, 169, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114287.
Ramos-Villagrasa, P. J. , Barrada, J. R. , Fernández-del-Río, E. , & Koopmans, L. (2019). Assessing Job Performance Using Brief Self-report Scales: The Case of the Individual Work Performance Questionnaire. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 35, 195 - 205. https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2019a21
Ranjan, R. (2024). The impact of employee engagement on retention: Correlations and success stories. https://globalhrcommunity.com/the-impact-of-employee-engagement-on-retention-correlations-and-success-stories/Accessed on 2 May 2025
Raralio, J. S. (2023). Work engagement, job satisfaction, and teaching performance of elementary teachers in the new normal. AIDE Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 2(1), 220–241. https://doi.org/10.56648/aide-irj.v2i1.32
Reig-Botella, A., Ramos-Villagrasa, P.J., Fernández-del Río, E., & Clemente, M. (2024). Don’t Curb Your Enthusiasm! The Role of Work Engagement in Predicting Job Performance. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 40(1): 51–60. https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2024a5
Rivaldo, Y., & Nabella, S. (2023). Employee performance: education, training, experience and work discipline. Quality - Access to Success. 24. 182-188. https://doi.org/10.47750/QAS/24.193.20.
Rothbard, N. P., & Patil, S. V. (2011). Being There: Work Engagement and Positive Organizational Scholarship. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734610.013.0005
Saks, A. M. (2022). A dual-process model of employee engagement: The role of job and organizational engagement. Human Resource Management Review, 32(2), 100835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100835
Schaufeli, W. B., & Baker, A. B. (2011). Defining & Measuring Work Engagement: Bringing Clarity to Concept. In Work Engagement: A Handbook of Essential Theory and Research, 10– 24. Psychology Press.
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two-sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies.
Schaufeli, W.B. (2014). What is engagement? In Truss C, Alfes K, Delbridge R, Shantz A, Soane E, eds. Employee Engagement in Theory and Practice. London: Routledge; pp. 15–35
Schaufeli, W. B., Taris, T. W., & Bakker, A. B. (2006). “Dr. Jekyll or Mr. Hyde: On the differences between work engagement and workaholism, Research companion to working time and work addiction”, Ed.by. Ronald J. Burke, Research Companion to Working Time and Work Addiction, Cheltenham, EdwardElgar, p. 193-217. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847202833.00018
Shirina, S., Sharma, R., Agarwal, R.N., & Sao, A. (2022). Factors affecting employee engagement in higher education institutions empirical study in NCR. J Inf Optim Sci 43(7):1779–1800
Shoshani, A. & Eldor, L. (2016). The informal learning of teachers: Learning climate, job satisfaction, and teachers’ and students’ motivation and well-being. International Journal of Educational Research, 79. 52-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.06.007.
Shuck, B., & Rose, K. (2013). Reframing employee engagement within the context of meaning and purpose: Implications for HRD. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 15 (4), 341–355, https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422313503235.
Sijbom, R. B. L., Emanuel, E. S., Koen, J., Baas, M., & De Schutter, L. (2025). Daily knowledge sharing at work: the role of daily knowledge sharing expectations, learning goal orientation and task interdependence. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 34(2), 298–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2025.2458343
Singh, R. (2024). Impact of long working hours on hotel employees. International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. 8(4), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsrem31967.
Spa Executive. (2024). Attract & retain top talent in the hotel industry: insights from Gallup’s “State of the Global Workplace”. https://spaexecutive.com/2024/06/24/attract-retain-top-talent-in-the-hotel-industry-insights-from-gallups-state-of-the-global-workplace/
Steger, M. F., Dik, B. J., & Duffy, R. D. (2012). Measuring meaningful work: The work and meaning inventory (WAMI). Journal of Career Assessment, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072711436160
Telu, S., & Potnuru, R.K.G. (2024). Work engagement among higher education teachers: exploring the influence of human values and subjective well-being. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 73(8), 2629-2649. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-07-2023-0385
Thakral, P., Dash, S. S., Sharma, D., & Ghosh, K. (2025). High-performance work systems and affective commitment: The mediating role of job embeddedness and perceived organizational support. Business Perspectives and Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/22785337251316387
Umair, A., Abdul, H., & Lazim, M. (2016). Meaningful work and work engagement: A relationship demanding urgent attention. Int J Acad Res Bus Soc Sci; 6(8): 116-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v6-i8/2264
Vidyarthi, P. R., Anand, S., & Liden, R. C. (2014). Do emotionally perceptive leaders motivate higher employee performance? The moderating role of task interdependence and power distance. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(2), 232–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.08.003
Walumbwa, F. O., Hsu, I. C., Wu, C., Misati, E., & Christensen-Salem, A. (2019). Employee service performance and collective turnover: examining the influence of initiating structure leadership, service climate and meaningfulness. Hum. Relat. 72, 1131–1153. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0018726718790649
Webb, N. (2017). Variables, control. In The sage encyclopedia of communication research methods (Vol. 4, pp. 1842-1842). SAGE Publications, Inc, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483381411
Widianto, S., Abdul Sahib, H. M., & Rahman, M. F. W. (2024). Task interdependence, team identity and team performance: A bottom-up multilevel model. SAGE Open, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241237874
Yao, J., Qiu, X., Yang, L, Han, X., & Li, Y. (2022). The Relationship Between Work Engagement and Job Performance: Psychological Capital as a Moderating Factor. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.729131
Ye, Y., & Chen, Kaung-Hwa. (2024). Hospitality employees and digital transformation: The mediating roles of alienation and motivation. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2024.103731.
Ye, L., Li, Y., Zhang, N., & Zhang, J. (2024). The Influence of Work Engagement on Employee Affect and Creativity: Insights from Occupational Mental Health. Behavioral Sciences, 14(12), 1217. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14121217
If a paper is approved for publication, its copyright has to be transferred by the author(s) to the Review of Business Management – RBGN.
Accordingly, authors are REQUIRED to send RBGN a duly completed and signed Copyright Transfer Form. Please refer to the following template: [Copyright Transfer]
The conditions set out by the Copyright Transfer Form state that the Review of Business Management – RBGN owns, free of charge and permanently, the copyright of the papers it publishes. Although the authors are required to sign the Copyright Transfer Form, RBGN allows authors to hold and use their own copyright without restrictions.
The texts published by RBGN are the sole responsibility of their authors.
The review has adopted the CC-BY Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 allowing redistribution and reuse of papers on condition that the authorship is properly credited.

