Abstract
Purpose – Our research examined the impact of readability on the understandability of notes to the financial statement and investigated the influence of a glossary on understandability.
Theoretical framework – Previous studies have treated readability and understandability as synonymous, but understandability is a broader concept influenced by contextual complexity, syntax, and individual characteristics.
Design/methodology/approach – We conducted an experiment involving 111 participants in Brazil with a background in accounting. We manipulated components of the Flesch readability metric and assessed their impact on understandability,
as measured by the Meaning Identification Test.
Findings – Enhancing the readability of financial statement notes did not improve their understandability. However, participants’ overall comprehension abilities and personal characteristics were found to significantly influence understandability. Additionally, the inclusion of a glossary of technical terms had a positive impact on understandability only for users with limited prior knowledge.
Practical & social implications of research – Researchers should consider alternative metrics to assess understandability. Standard setters and regulators should reconsider the effectiveness of presenting a glossary. Investors can advocate for
improved text quality measures and the presentation of high quality information.
Originality/value – Most readability studies focus on reports written in English, and they are mainly applied to Anglophone countries. Our study extends this area of research in Brazil to reports written in Portuguese. Additionally, it highlights
the need to explore the relationship between readability and understandability, as traditional readability formulas may not fully capture the comprehensibility of a text.
Keywords: Readability, understandability, notes to the financial statements
References
Ajina, A., Laouiti, M., & Msolli, B. (2016). Guiding through the Fog: Does annual report readability reveal earnings management? Research in International Business and Finance, 38, 509-516. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2016.07.021.
Bacha, S., & Ajina, A. (2020). CSR performance and annual report readability: Evidence from France. Corporate Governance (Bradford), 20(2), 201-215. http://dx.doi. org/10.1108/CG-02-2019-0060.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderatormediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173- 1182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.PMid:3806354.
Besuglov, E., & Crasselt, N. (2021). The effect of readability and language choice in management accounting reports on risk-taking: An experimental study. Journal of Business Economics, 91(1), 5-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11573-020-00980-4.
Borges, G., & Rech, I. (2019). Determinantes da legibilidade das notas explicativas de companhias brasileiras. Revista de Gestão, Finanças e Contabilidade, 9(3), 31-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.18028/rgfc.v9i3.7522.
BRF. (2015). Relatórios Financeiros: Demonstrações Financeiras Padronizadas. https://www.b3.com.br/pt_br/ produtos-e-servicos/negociacao/renda-variavel/empresaslistadas.htm?codigo=16292
Cadorin, J., & Theiss, V. (2022). Gerenciamento de impressão das narrativas contábeis da Vale S.A. em detrimento do rompimento da barragem de Brumadinho. Revista Mineira de Contabilidade, 23(2), 32-42. http:// dx.doi.org/10.51320/rmc.v23i2.1344.
Comitê de Pronunciamentos Contábeis. (2009, 04 de dezembro). Pronunciamento Técnico PME - Contabilidade para Pequenas e Médias Empresas. http://www.cpc.org.br
Comitê de Pronunciamentos Contábeis. (2014, 26 setembro). Orientação Técnica OCPC 07 - Evidenciação na Divulgação dos Relatórios Contábil-Financeiros de Propósito Geral. http://www.cpc.org.br/CPC/Documentos-Emitidos/ Orientacoes/Orientacao?Id=95
Dias Fo., J. M., & Nakagawa, M. (2001). Análise do processo da comunicação contábil: Uma contribuição para a solução de problemas Semânticos, Utilizando Conceitos da Teoria da Comunicação. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 15(26), 42-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/ S1519-70772001000200003.
Dreyer, L. G. (1984). Readability and responsibility. Journal of Reading, 27(4), 334-338. http://www.jstor. org/stable/40029347
Elliott, W., Hodge, F., Kennedy, J., & Pronk, M. (2007). Are M.B.A. Students a Good Proxy for Nonprofessional Investors? The Accounting Review, 82(1), 139-168. http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/accr.2007.82.1.139.
Ernst & Young. (2016). SEC comments and trends: An analysis of current reporting issues. US Professional Practice Group.
Evans, L., Baskerville, R., & Nara, K. (2015). Colliding Worlds: Issues relating to language translation in accounting and some lesson from other disciplines. Abacus, 51(1), 1-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/abac.12040.
Glaum, M., Baetge, J., Grothe, A., & Oberdörster, T. (2013). Introduction of International Accounting Standards, disclosure quality and accuracy of analysts’ earnings forecasts. European Accounting Review, 22(1), 79- 116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2011.558301.
Gomes, M., Ferreira, R., & Martins, V. (2018). O impacto da OCPC 07 sobre o tamanho e a legibilidade das notas explicativas de companhias brasileiras. Revista Universo Contábil, 14(2), 162-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.4270/ ruc.2018216.
Gosselin, A.-M., Maux, J., & Smaili, N. (2021). Readability of accounting disclosures: A comprehensive review and research agenda. Perspectives Comptable, 20(4), 543-581. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1911-3838.12275.
Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M., & Cai, Z. (2004). Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(2), 193-202. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/ BF03195564.PMid:15354684.
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall.
Hassan, M., Abbas, B., & Garas, S. (2019). Readability, governance and performance: A test of the obfuscation hypothesis in Qatari listed firms. Corporate Governance (Bradford), 19(2), 270-298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ CG-05-2018-0182.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. The Guilford Press.
Hendriksen, E. S., & Breda, M. E. (1999). Teoria da contabilidade (5ª ed.). Atlas. Iudícibus, S. (2009). Teoria da contabilidade (9ª ed.).
Atlas. Jones, M. J. (1997). Methodological themes: Critical appraisal of the cloze procedure’s use in the acounting domain. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 10(1), 105-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513579710158739.
Jones, M., & Smith, M. (2014). Traditional and alternative methods of measuring the understandability of accounting narratives. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(1), 183-208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2013-1314.
Klare, G. R. (1974-1975). Assessing readability. Reading Research Quarterly, 10(1), 62-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/747086.
KPMG. (2011). Disclosure overload and complexity: Hidden in plain sight. Ferf - Financial executives research foundation.
Leffa, V. J. (1996). Aspectos da leitura: Uma perspectiva psicolinguística. Sagra DC Luzatto.
Lewis, N. R., Parker, L. D., Pound, G. D., & Sutcliffe, P. (1986). Accounting Report Readability: The Use ofReadability Techniques. Accounting and Business Research, 16(63), 199-213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00014788.1986.9729318.
Li, F. (2008). Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45(2), 221-247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. jacceco.2008.02.003.
Lo, K., Ramos, F., & Rogo, R. (2017). Earnings management and annual report readability. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 63(1), 1-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2016.09.002.
Lopes, J. E., Ribeiro, R., & Cavalcante, P. (2009, Julho/ Dezembro). A Informação Contábil à Luz da Teoria da Comunicação. Revista Ambiente Contábil, 1(2), pp. 22-37. https://periodicos.ufrn.br/ambiente/article/view/1335
Loughran, T., & McDonald, B. (2014). Measuring readability in financial disclosures. The Journal of Finance, 69(4), 1643-1671. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12162.
Loughran, T., & McDonald, B. (2016). Textual analysis in accounting and finance: A survey. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(4), 1187-1230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1475- 679X.12123.
Marchant 3rd., H. G., Royer, J. M., & Greene, B. A. (1988). Superior reliability and validity for a new form of the sentence verification technique for measuring comprehension. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48(3), 827- 834. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164488483032.
Martins, T. B., Ghiraldelo, C. M., Nunes, M. G., & Oliveira Jr., O. N. (1996). Readability Formulas Applied to Textbooks in Brazilian Portuguese (Série Computação, 28). ICMSC-USP. Notas do ICMSC-USP.
McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M., & Graesser, A. C. (2002). Coh-Metrix: Automated cohesion and coherence scores to predict text readability and facilitate comprehension. Project funded by the University of Memphis.
Mendes, M. S., & Lucena, W. G. L. (2022). Legibilidade nos releases de resultados das Companhias Brasileiras Abertas. Revista Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança, 25(3), 416-434. http://dx.doi.org/10.51341/cgg.v25i3.2918.
Monteiro, J., Rengel, R., Sousa, A., & Borba, J. (2020). Não basta ler, é preciso compreender: Um enfoque na legibilidade do resultado e do EBITDA. Revista Universo Contábil, 16(3), 31-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.4270/ruc2020314.
Moreno, A., & Casasola, A. (2015). A readability evolution of narratives in annual reports: A longitudinal study of two Spanish companies. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 29, 1-34. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/1050651915620233.
Noh, M. (2021). Culture and annual report readability. International Journal fo Accounting &. Information & Management, 29(4), 583-602. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-05-2021-0094.
Razik, T. A. (1969). A study of American newspaper readability. Journal of Communication, 19(4), 317-324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1969.tb00854.x.
Rennekamp, K. (2012). Processing fluency and investors’ reactions to disclosure readability. Journal of Accounting Research, 50(5), 1319-1354. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ j.1475-679X.2012.00460.x.
Rush, R. T. (1985). Assessing readability: Formulas and alternatives. The Reading Teacher, 39(3), 274-283. https:// www.jstor.org/stable/20199072
Santos, E., Calixto, L., & Bispo, M. (2019). Impact of the Brazilian Accounting Pronouncements Committee’s New Guideline (OCPC 07) on the downsizing of companies’ Notes. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 30(79), 58-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201806650.
Schriver, K. A. (1989). Evaluating text quality: The continuum from text-focused to reader-focused methods. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 32(4), 238-255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/47.44536.
Securities and Exchange Commission. (1998). A plain english handbook: How to create clear SEC disclosure documents. Office of Investor Education and Assistance. https://www.sec.gov/pdf/handbook.pdf
Sena, T., Santana Jr., J., & Freitas, S. (2023). Gerenciamento de resultados e legibilidade das notas explicativas: Manipulações nas evidenciações contábeis. Revista de Educação e Pesquisa em Contabilidade, 17(1), 84-109. http://dx.doi.org/10.17524/repec.v17i1.3214.
Silva, R., Castro, L., Domingos, S., & Ponte, V. (2020). Nível de Disclosure e forma de apresentação das notas explicativas: Um estudo à Luz da OCPC 07. Revista Contabilidade Vista & Revista, 31(3), 74-96. http://dx.doi. org/10.22561/cvr.v31i2.5354.
Sinônimos. (2016). Dicionário online de sinônimos. https:// www.sinonimos.com.br/
Smith, M., & Taffler, R. (1992). Readability and understandability: Different measures of the textual complexity of accounting narrative. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 5(4), 84-98. http://dx.doi. org/10.1108/09513579210019549.
Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290-312. http://dx.doi. org/10.2307/270723.
Soepriyanto, G., Tjokroaminoto, S., & Zudana, A. (2021). Annual report readability and accounting irregularities: Evidence from public listed companies in Indonesia. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 19(5), 793-818. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-01-2020-0006.
Soper, F., & Dolphin Jr., R. (1964). Readability and corporate annual reports. The Accounting Review, 39(2), 358-362. https://www.jstor.org/stable/243526
Souza, J., & Borba, J. (2022). Readability como medida de complexidade textual: Determinantes e evidências em empresas brasileiras. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 33(88), 112-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1808- 057x202114180.
Sun, Y., Wang, J., & Huang, K. (2022). Does IFRS and GRI adoption impact the understandability of corporate reports by Chinese listed companies? Accounting and Finance, 62(2), 2879-2904. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12908.
Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson.
Telles, S., & Salotti, B. (2020). Intelligibility VS Readability: Understandanility measures of financial information. Revista Universo Contábil, 16(2), 110. http://dx.doi. org/10.4270/ruc.2020209.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2022). World portuguese language day. https://www.unesco.org/en/days/portuguese-language-day
Worthington, J. S. (1977). The readability of footnotes to financial statements and how to improve them. Journal of Reading, 20(6), 469-478. https://www.jstor. org/stable/40010895
If a paper is approved for publication, its copyright has to be transferred by the author(s) to the Review of Business Management – RBGN.
Accordingly, authors are REQUIRED to send RBGN a duly completed and signed Copyright Transfer Form. Please refer to the following template: [Copyright Transfer]
The conditions set out by the Copyright Transfer Form state that the Review of Business Management – RBGN owns, free of charge and permanently, the copyright of the papers it publishes. Although the authors are required to sign the Copyright Transfer Form, RBGN allows authors to hold and use their own copyright without restrictions.
The texts published by RBGN are the sole responsibility of their authors.
The review has adopted the CC-BY Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 allowing redistribution and reuse of papers on condition that the authorship is properly credited.