The role of satisfaction with the performance appraisal: A comparative study between the public and private sectors


Performance appraisal process
satisfaction with performance appraisal
comparative study

How to Cite

Rodrigues, R. I., Gomes, C., & Junça-Silva, A. (2023). The role of satisfaction with the performance appraisal: A comparative study between the public and private sectors. Review of Business Management, 25(1).


Purpose – To study in Portugal (a) whether satisfaction with the performance appraisal (PA) differs depending on the sector where the workers perform their functions (private versus public), and (b) whether the relationship between workers’ perception of usefulness and accuracy of the performance appraisal process (PAP) and satisfaction with the outcome of their last PA is mediated by their satisfaction with the PAP.

Theoretical framework – The PA has come to occupy a prominent place in organizations, because only it can be used to measure the skills of their workers and the way they contribute to achieving organizational success both qualitatively and quantitatively.

Design/methodology/approach – Eight hundred and sixty-six professionals from the public and private sectors participated in this study. Data were collected using two multi-item questionnaires and two single-item scales.

Findings – The results revealed that private sector employees showed higher levels of satisfaction with their PAs than those from the public sector. Furthermore, the results indicated that the usefulness and accuracy of the PAP had a significant and positive relationship with employees’ satisfaction with their last PA, and this relationship was partially mediated by satisfaction with the PAP, both in the public and private sectors.

Practical & social implications of research – Regardless of the activity sector, it is fundamental that the PAP is useful and accurate; otherwise it is discredited, which prevents it from fulfilling its purpose and contributes to increasing the levels of worker dissatisfaction.

Originality/value – This study clarified the differences that may emerge regarding satisfaction with PAs between the Portuguese public and private sectors. In addition, this is the first national or international study to analyse the aforementioned constructs in an integrated manner.

Keywords – performance appraisal process, satisfaction with performance appraisal, accuracy, usefulness, comparative study.


AHMED, I., & SATTAR, A. (2018). The influence of justice perceptions on performance appraisal reactions in telecom sector of Pakistan. Global Management Journal for Academic & Corporate Studies, 8(1), 86-100.

AL-JEDAIA, Y., & MEHREZ, A. (2020). The effect of performance appraisal on job performance in governmental sector: The mediating role of motivation. Management Science Letters, 10(9), 2077-2088.

BARBIERI, M., MICACCHI, L., VIDÈ, F., & VALOTTI, G. (2023). The performance of performance appraisal systems: A theoretical framework for public organizations. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 43(1), 104-129.

BAYO-MORIONES, A., GALDON-SANCHEZ, J., & MARTINEZ-DE-MORENTIN, S. (2020). Business strategy, performance appraisal and organizational results. Personnel Review, 50(2), 515-534.

BELSITO, C., & REUTZEL, C. (2019). SME employee performance appraisal formalization and trust in leadership change. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 28(2), 434-456.

CORREIA, P., MENDES, I., & SILVA, S. (2019). A perceção de justiça na avaliação do desempenho na Administração Pública e a produtividade. Sociologia, 37,31-50.

CUNHA, M., VIEIRA, D., REGO, A., & CLEGG, S. (2018). Why does performance management not perform? International Journal of Productivity and PerformanceManagement, 67(4), 673-692.

DIAMANTIDIS, A., & CHATZOGLOU, P. (2019). Factors affecting employee performance: An empirical approach. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 68(1), 171-193.

DOLBIER, C., WEBSTER, J., MCCALISTER, K., MALLON, M., & STEINHARDT, M. (2005). Reliability and validity of a single-item measure of job satisfaction. American Journal of Health Promotion, 19(3), 194-198. PMid:15693347.

European Union. (2003, May 20). Commission Recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises. Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea.

FORNELL, C., & LARCKER, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1),39-50.

GRELLER, M. (1978). The nature of subordinate participation in the appraisal interview. Academy ofManagement Journal, 21(4), 646-658.

HAIR, J., BLACK, W., BABIN, B., ANDERSON, R., & TATHAM, R. (2018). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.

HE, W., CHEN, L., & LIU, W. (2020). Does new performance appraisal system (EVA) affect earnings management? Nankai Business Review International, 11(2),191-216.

Instituto Nacional de Estatística – INE, 2011. Classificação Portuguesa das Profissões 2010. Portugal.

ISHAK, M., ZALLI, M., HARON, M., & MAJID, N. (2021). Examination of appraisal fairness as a mediator in explaining teachers’ performance appraisal in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Research in Education and Social Sciences, 3(2), 212-220.

ISMAIL, H., & RISHANI, M. (2018). The relationships among performance appraisal satisfaction, career development and creative behavior. Journal of Developing Areas, 52(3), 109-124.

JORDAN, P., & TROTH, A. (2020). Common method bias in applied settings: The dilemma of researching in organizations. Australian Journal of Management, 45(1), 3-14.

KEEPING, L., & LEVY, P. (2000). Performance appraisal reactions: Measurement, modeling, and method bias. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 708-723. PMid:11055144.

KHAN, M., HUSSAIN, A., HUSSAIN, J., & KHAN, M. (2020a). Effect of performance appraisal on employees’ satisfaction: A case study of University of Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Review of Applied Management and Social Sciences, 3(2), 131-140.

KHAN, M., HUSSAIN, A., & KHAN, M. (2020b). The role of rater motivation and training in effective performance appraisal system in public sector Universities of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Journal of Accounting and Finance in Emerging Economies, 6(1), 155-166.

KHAN, M., YUSOFF, R., HUSSAIN, A., & ISMAIL, F. (2019). The mediating effect of job satisfaction on the relationship of HR practices and employee job performance: Empirical evidence from higher education sector. International Journal of Organizational Leadership,

(1), 78-94.

KIM, T., & HOLZER, M. (2016). Public employees and performance appraisal: A study of antecedents to employees’ perception of the process. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 36(1), 31-56.

LIRA, M. (2014). Satisfaction with a performance appraisal system in the Portuguese public sector: The importance of perceptions of justice and accuracy. Tékhne (Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave), 12(1), 30-37.

LIRA, M., SILVA, V., & VISEU, C. (2016). Performance appraisal as a motivational tool in the Portuguese public administration. Portuguese Journal of Finance, Management and Accounting, 2(3), 91-118.

LITTMAN, A., WHITE, E., SATIA, J., BOWEN, D.,& KRISTAL, A. (2006). Reliability and validity of 2 single-item measures of psychosocial stress. Epidemiology 17(4), 398-403. PMid:16641618

MADUREIRA, C., RANDO, B., & FERRAZ, D. (2021). The public administration performance appraisal integrated system (SIADAP) and the Portuguese civil servants perceptions. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(4), 300-310.

MEMON, M., SALLEH, R., MIRZA, M., CHEAH, J.,TING, H., & AHMAD, M. (2019). Performance appraisal satisfaction and turnover intention: The mediating role of work engagement. Management Decision, 58(6), 1053-1066.

MEMON, M., SALLEH, R., MIRZA, M., CHEAH,J., TING, H., AHMAD, M., & TARIQ, A. (2020). Satisfaction matters: The relationships between HRM practices, work engagement and turnover intention. International Journal of Manpower, 42(1), 21-50.

MARÔCO, J. (2021). Análise de equações estruturais: Fundamentos teóricos, software & aplicações. Pêro Pinheiro: Report Number.

MURPHY, K. (2020). Performance evaluation will not die, but it should. Human Resource Management Journal, 30(1), 13-31.

MURPHY, K., CLEVELAND, J., & HANSCOM, M.(2018). Performance appraisal and management: Why does it fail and how can it be fixed? Atlanta: Sage.

MWESHI, G., & SAKYI, K. (2020). Application of sampling methods for the research design. Archives of Business Review,8(11), 180-193.

NAEEM, M., JAMAL, W., & RIAZ, M. (2017). The relationship of employees’ performance appraisal satisfaction with employees’ outcomes: Evidence from higher educational institutes. FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 11(2), 71-81.

NGUYEN, P., YANDI, A., & MAHAPUTRA, M. (2020). Factors that influence employee performance: Motivation, leadership, environment, culture organization, work achievement, competence and compensation (a study of human resource management literature studies). Dinasti International Journal of Digital Business Management, 1(4), 645-662.

OKOLIE, U., NWAJIUBA, C., BINUOMOTE, M., OSUJI, C., ONAJITE, G., & IGWE, P. (2020). How careers advice and guidance can facilitate career development in technical, vocational education, and training graduates: The case in Nigeria. Australian Journal of Career Development, 29(2), 97-106.

PAGAN, R., & MALO, M. Á. (2021). Performance appraisal and job satisfaction for workers without and with disabilities by gender. Social Indicators Research,153(3), 1011-1039.

PEDERSINI, D., & ENSSLIN, S. (2020). Os estudos empíricos internacionais no setor público têm feito uso dos sistemas de avaliação de desempenho em sua plenitude? Revista Eletrônica de Estratégia & Negócios, 13(1), 207-235.

PICHLER, S. (2019). Performance appraisal reactions: A review and research agenda. In L. A. Steelman & J. R. Williams (Eds.), Feedback at work (pp. 75-96). Cham: Springer.

Portugal, Assembleia da República. (2007, December 28). Establishes the integrated system for performance management and appraisal in the Public Administration (Law n. 66-B/2007 of 28th December). Diário da República. nº 250/2007, I Série.

Portugal, Direção-Geral da Administração e do Emprego Público – DGAEP. (2020). SIADAP. c2202

PREACHER, K. (2022). Calculation for the Sobel Test: An interactive calculation tool for mediation tests.

RAHMAN, A., ISLAM, H., & SARKER, R. (2020). The effect of management by objectives on performance appraisal and employee satisfaction in commercial bank. European Journal of Business Management and Research,12(20), 15-25.

RUBIN, E., & EDWARDS, A. (2020). The performance of performance appraisal systems: Understanding the linkage between appraisal structure and appraisal discrimination complaints. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(15), 1938-1957.

SETIAWATI, T., & ARIANI, I. (2020). Influence of performance appraisal fairness and job satisfaction through commitment on job performance. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 9(3), 133-151.

SINGH, S., & SINGH, A. (2018). Interplay of organizational justice, psychological empowerment, organizational citizenship behavior, and job satisfaction in the context of circular economy. Management Decision, 57(4), 937-952.

SONI, M. (2020). A Review: Performance appraisal satisfaction among female employees. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 22(7), 43-46.

STEWART, G., & BROWN, K. (2020). Human resource management: Linking strategy to practice (4th ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.

STONE, D., GUEUTAL, H., & MCINTOSH, B. (1984). The effects of feedback sequence and expertise of the rater on perceived feedback accuracy. Personnel Psychology, 37(3), 487-506.

VUONG, B., TUNG, D., HOA, N., CHAU, N., & TUSHAR, H. (2020). An empirical assessment of organizational commitment and job performance: Vietnam small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(6), 277-286.

WIDIANI, Y., & DUDIJA, N. (2020). A literature review of performance appraisal reaction: Predictors and measurement. In I. Rachmawati & R. Hendayani (Eds.), Managing learning organization in Industry 4.0 (pp. 143-148). London: Routlegde.

XIA, Y., & YANG, Y. (2018). The influence of number of categories and threshold values on fit indices in structural equation modeling with ordered categorical data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 53(5), 731-755. PMid:30477318.

If a paper is approved for publication, its copyright has to be transferred by the author(s) to the Review of Business Management – RBGN.

Accordingly, authors are REQUIRED to send RBGN a duly completed and signed Copyright Transfer Form. Please refer to the following template: [Copyright Transfer]

The conditions set out by the Copyright Transfer Form state that the Review of Business Management – RBGN owns, free of charge and permanently, the copyright of the papers it publishes. Although the authors are required to sign the Copyright Transfer Form, RBGN allows authors to hold and use their own copyright without restrictions.

The texts published by RBGN are the sole responsibility of their authors.

The review has adopted the CC-BY Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 allowing redistribution and reuse of papers on condition that the authorship is properly credited.