Abstract
Purpose – This work aims to analyze whether market indicators, in complementarity to accounting indicators, have the ability to anticipate changes (upgrades or downgrades) in the assessments of risk rating (rating) of banks in Brazil.
Design/methodology/approach – We used information based on the merger of two databases, Economatica and Standard & Poor’s/Fitch, from 2010 to 2014, and linear regressions based on probit models.
Findings – Our results show that market-based indicators as Sovereign Risk and GDP growth, together with accounting-based indicators as asset quality, liquidity, risk, capital and profitability, have predictive power for risk rating changes of banks in Brazil. The results still show that the market did not price changes in Brazilian banks’ ratings in windows ending in the event date. Such evidence suggest that Sovereign Risk and economic-systemic factors can be used to proxy for risk in volatile markets with high uncertainty.
Originality/value – Unlike in developed countries, the Brazilian stock market, young and not very representative of the economy, was not able to anticipate changes in the banks' rating. This study anticipates information to investors who aid in the decision to buy, hold or sell securities, and signals that the financial system is more susceptible to macroeconomic shocks in unstable economies.
If a paper is approved for publication, its copyright has to be transferred by the author(s) to the Review of Business Management – RBGN.
Accordingly, authors are REQUIRED to send RBGN a duly completed and signed Copyright Transfer Form. Please refer to the following template: [Copyright Transfer]
The conditions set out by the Copyright Transfer Form state that the Review of Business Management – RBGN owns, free of charge and permanently, the copyright of the papers it publishes. Although the authors are required to sign the Copyright Transfer Form, RBGN allows authors to hold and use their own copyright without restrictions.
The texts published by RBGN are the sole responsibility of their authors.
The review has adopted the CC-BY Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 allowing redistribution and reuse of papers on condition that the authorship is properly credited.