Sex and gender identity differences in psychological job outcomes among salespeople

Purpose – The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was any difference among sex and gender identity groups for salespeople in terms of psychological job outcomes, namely job stress, organizational commitment, intention to leave, and job satisfaction. Design/methodology/approach – Data was collected from salespeople using a survey. The questionnaire used was administered to a convenience sample of pharmaceutical salespeople from south-central region of Turkey, through a self-administered questionnaire. Findings – The findings suggested that there were differences between sex groups in psychological job outcomes except job stress, while there were differences between gender identity groups in all of them. There already exist sex differences and also gender identity differences regarding the job outcomes in sales force. Androgynous individuals have the most appropriate gender identity for sales profession, considering that they had a high level of job satisfaction and organizational commitment and a low level of job stress and intention to leave. Originality/value – The major contribution of this study to the literature and administrative implications is the enrichment of information concerning gender-based similarities and/or differences among salespeople in terms of job outcomes with a new and different approach.


Introduction
Gender in sales management is a significant and newsworthy subject matter to be analyzed in terms of administrative implications and academic studies, by virtue of (biological) sex based diversity resulting from the participation of women in sales force and the ever increasing number of these women (Macintosh & Krush, 2014;McQuiston & Morris, 2009;Rutherford, Marshall, & Park, 2014), changes in characteristics of gender identity (psychological gender) required by the sales profession, and changes in gender identity. Furthermore, gender-based analysis on sales force in terms of psychological job outcomes (job stress, intention to leave, organizational commitment and job satisfaction) offers a different and effective insight into the attitudes of salespeople towards their job by classifying individual differences. It also highlights administrative implications in a broad range, from selection of salespeople to their training.
In light of the current literature, matters mentioned below require a detailed analysis on sales force in terms of both sex and gender identity to understand changes of sales force and manage it in the course of time.
• Diversity in gender: Even though it is predicted that the difference between men and women in sales profession has decreased with the passing of time and is expected to go on decreasing (Monciref, Babakus, Cravens, & Johnston, 2000), current research shows that there are still some differences (Macintosh & Krush, 2014;Rutherford et al., 2014). Furthermore, some studies on gender identity point out that masculine characteristics of women have increased due to cultural, social, and economic reasons (Özkan & Lajunen, 2005;Twenge, 1997) and no change has occurred in the femininity level of men (Twenge, 1997). Thus, it is suggested that gender identities has undergone a change (Demirtaş-Madran, 2012;Özkan & Lajunen, 2005;Twenge, 1997). • Inconsistent findings in sex: Although gender is an important matter of research in sales literature, it is also emphasized that there are problems with the difficulty and inconsistency in reaching a binding conclusion regarding the presence of any difference among salespeople in terms of sex (Beetles & Haris, 2005;Macintosh & Krush, 2014;Monciref et al., 2000). • Limited number of studies in gender identity: It is also clear that studies on gender are mostly based on biological aspects, and there is a limited number of studies on psychological features. This limited number of studies mainly focuses on the characteristics of gender identities that fit into the sales profession (Comer & Drollingerr, 1996;Comer & Jolson, 1991;Goolsby, Lagace, & Boorom, 1992;Jolson & Comer, 1997;Lagace & Twible, 1990;Spiro & Weitz , 1990;Teer, Tobacyk, & Dawson, 1992). Thus, there is a research gap about gender identity in terms of psychological job outcomes which should be fulfilled. • Impact of gender identity: It is indicated that sex has no impact especially on job satisfaction and job stress. However, there may be a strong relationship between masculinity and femininity characteristics as gender identity groups and them (Eichinger, 2000;Eichinger, Heifetz, & Ingraham, 1991). • Culture: In general literature, there are mixed results on gender identity in terms of psychological job outcomes (Eichinger, 2000;Eichinger et al., 1991;Ushasree, Seshu Reddy, & Vinolya, 1995). It is thought that these mixed results stem from cultural differences (Eichinger, 2000). To this extent, a study on psychological job outcomes of salespeople in Turkey in the context of gender identity groups Sex and gender identity differences in psychological job outcomes among salespeople will arouse interest for researchers and practitioners, as it will fill the gaps in literature and support administrative implications. It will also provide findings about salespeople with cultural properties different from the countries in previous studies. It is suggested that it is essential to examine the gender identity in Turkey, as an emerging market, because of its culture mixing Western and Islamic culture and reasons such as increase in urbanization, industrialization, international and regional migration and education opportunities and protection of working women's rights (Özkan & Lajunen, 2005). Furthermore, an analysis on women in sales force under the circumstances in Turkey will be useful for both the literature and administrative practitioners, as women have recently participated in the sales profession and the number of these women increases rapidly. Based on the aforementioned necessities and gaps in the literature, the purpose of the this study was to determine whether there is any difference among sex and gender identity groups for salespeople in terms of psychological job outcomes. For this purpose, research questions were gathered under two main titles. These were: • Are there sex differences in psychological job outcomes for salespeople? If any differences exist, which group has a higher level of psychological job outcomes for each type? • Are there gender identity differences in psychological job outcomes for salespeople? If any differences exist, which gender identity group has a higher level of psychological job outcomes for each type? This study analyzed the psychological job outcomes in terms gender identity as distinct from previous studies analyzing gender in sales force. In comparison to other workers, salespeople maintaining consistent connection with customers provide opportunities to learn customer needs, create targeted product proposals and sales pitches (Chai, Zhao, & Babin, 2012), and subsequently they have key roles in creating long-term customer relationship (Robinson, Marshall, Moncrief, & Lask, 2002;Weitz & Bradford, 1999). Salespeople are the strong representatives of the organizations thus, the individual differences between the salespeople should be taken into account in order to manage the salespeople effectively. Furthermore, this study was conducted in an emerging market, unlike other studies that have been conducted in developed countries. Therefore, the main expected contribution of this study to the literature and administrative implications is the enrichment of information concerning gender-based similarities and/or differences among salespeople in terms of job outcomes with a new and different approach.

Sex and gender identity
Sex is biologically divided into two groups: female and male while gender identity is psychologically grouped as masculine, feminine, androgen and undifferentiated (Bem, Martyna & Watson, 1976). Gender identity is related to part of individuals' self-concept effected by cultural description about the regarding favorable properties of women and men (Schruijer, 2006).
Bem's gender identity theory and related measures are accepted as the most popular approach to date, and it is seen that her gender identity groups and measures are used in upto-date research studies (Bolat & Odacı, 2016;Koca, Aşçı, & Kirazcı, 2005;Matud, Bethencourt, & Ibáñez, 2014;Özkan & Lajunen, 2005;Ramkissoon & Nunkoo, 2012;Winterich, Mittal, & Ross, 2009;Yoon & Kim, 2014). Bem's approach is also widely utilized by various social scientists such as psychologists, sociologists to understand gender identity and its relations to behaviors. Bem's sex role inventory (BSRI) offer a direct measure of gender identity in which participants clearly rate themselves on different personal characteristics, resulting in scores on rating scales (Wood & Eagly, 2015).
Based on Bem's approach, gender identity represents that individuals confirming gender stereotypic traits as self-descriptive are assumed to integrate themselves into their self-concepts and guide their behavior associated with this self-knowledge (Wodd & Eagly, 2015). In a society, individuals adopting characteristics attributed to men are described as masculine and those upholding characteristics attributed to women are described as feminine individuals (Özkan & Lajunen, 2005). A man may have feminine characteristics, while women may have the characteristics of masculinity. Androgen individuals have high level of both masculine and feminine characteristics and undifferentiated individuals have low level of both masculine and feminine characteristics (Bem et al., 1976).
Bem's approach suggests that masculine characteristics are responsible for their family, dominant, non-demonstrative, masculine, forceful, sociable, coming out against injustice, ambitious, idealist, defending their own needs, self-confident, prim and proper, acting as a leader, sensible, authoritarian, willing to take risks, aggressive and willing to keep promises. Feminine characteristics are: affectionate, cheerful, childlike, compassionate, not using harsh language, eager to soothe hurt feelings, feminine, flatterable, gentle, gullible, loves children, loyal, sensitive to the needs of others, shy, soft-spoken, sympathetic, tender, understanding, warm, and yielding (Dökmen, 1999). Androgynous individuals have high level of masculine and feminine characteristics and display both instrumentality, namely focus on the performance of a work or solution of a problem, and expressiveness, namely well-being of others and group cohesiveness (Bem et al., 1976). Androgynous individuals may also demonstrate flexibility in mutual relationships among individuals. This flexibility develops on the basis of situational convenience of the behavior (Spiro & Weitz, 1990). Androgens are also known as having higher self-expectation and better performance in competitive environment (Gianakos, 2000), more self-efficacy in career decision making (Bolat & Odacı, 2016;Gianakos, 2000), having a lower anxiety level (Demirtaş-Madran, 2012), more learning oriented (McFarland & Kidwell, 2006: 147), and to be good listeners (Comer & Drollinger, 1999).

Job stress
Stress is the physical and emotional reaction to the potential threats of the environment (Akgemci, 2001). In the sales management literature, job stress is accepted as a psychological process and assumed to occur when the salesperson cannot reach or exceed his job-related expectations (Sager & Wilson, 1995).
Salespeople are thought to have a great tendency to experience job stress. The main reason behind this tendency is the specific nature of the sales profession. Scope of the boundaries of salespeople' roles and attention grabbing nature of their performances cause job stress. Salespeople are required to meet conflicting demands of their managers and customers and maintain regular communication with them in order to achieve job targets. This leads to a stressful work environment most of the time (Sager & Wilson, 1995). Reasons like personality traits, role conflicts, role ambiguity, inexperience, workload, management style, and work-family conflict are other determining factors on job stress of salespeople (Yapraklı & Yılmaz, 2007).
Gender is assumed as a significant factor determining the stress in workplace (Bickford, 2005;Gaur & Jain, 2013;Rivera-Torres, Araque-Padilla, & Montero-Simó, 2013) and it is suggested that women feel negative impacts of stress more than men (Bickford, 2005;Rivera-Torres et al., 2013). However, in their leading study on gender differences in sales force, Monciref et al. (2000) show that there is no difference of job stress among saleswomen and salesmen, and a recent research confirms this result (Mulki, Jaramillo, Goad, & Pesquera, 2015). Research conducted on sales literature reveals no study on psychological gender, however, it is seen in the general literature that there is a difference among psychological gender groups. A study on bank employees suggests that there is no difference of job stress perceptions of women and men, however, there is a difference associated with gender identity. In this regard, masculine individuals have a lower level of job stress when compared to feminine individuals. This is grounded on the psychological origin of job stress and higher importance of the relationship of psychological gender with job stress than its relationship with biological sex (Shen, 2014;Wu & Shih, 2010). Androgynous persons have more adaption to workplace stress than others, and in case they have workplace stress, they display help seeking, positive thinking, and direct action more than other gender identities and use strategies to adapt to specific situation demands (Gianakos, 2000). According to the behavioral flexibility theory, androgynous individuals having both masculine and feminine characteristics are able to give more appropriate responses to various situations when compared to other individuals. In other words, thanks to the "behavioral flexibility", they experience a lower level of stress and thus have better psychological health (Eichinger, 2000). Recent studies indicate that they have a lower anxiety level (Cheng, 2005;Demirtaş-Madran, 2012), lower levels of perceived stress (Jones, Mendenhall, & Myers, 2016), higher level of mental health, well-being and happiness (Demirtaş-Madran, 2016) and also are less prone to depression (Demirtaş-Madran, 2012). Considering the given information, it was expected in this study that there would be an equal level of job stress among biological sex groups and a different level of job stress among gender identity groups. Thus; H1: There is not a difference in sex groups regarding the means of job stress.
H2: There is a difference in gender identity groups regarding the means of job stress.

Intention to leave
Intention to leave is thought to be a good estimator in the prediction of employees' turnover (Choi, 2006) while gender differences are accepted highly important factor to find out the development of turnover decision (Wiesberg & Kirschenbaum, 1993). Recent studies have offered inconsistent results on gender differences/ similarities regarding the intention to leave (Selvarajan, Slattery, & Stringer, 2015;Shukla & Srivastava, 2016). Women may have a high level of intention to leave due to reasons like pregnancy, maternity and discrimination at work (Nelson & Quick, 1985). Ladik, Marshall, Lassk, & Moncrief (2002) determined that salesmen with high performance have a higher intention to leave when compared to saleswomen with high performance. It is found out in the pioneering studies in the sales literature that saleswomen have a higher intention to leave when compared to that of salesmen (Busch & Bush,1978;Monciref et al., 2000;Schul & Wren,1992). No study analyzing intention to leave in terms of psychological gender was found in the literature research.
Women were expected to have a higher level of intention to leave in this study considering dominant findings in the literature. It was anticipated that feminine characteristics like Ceyda Tanrikulu being loyal and sympathetic would scale down the intention to leave and masculine characteristics like ambition, willingness to take risk, and courage would scale up this intention. Therefore, hypotheses were: H3: There is a difference in sex groups regarding the means of intention to leave.
H4: There is a difference in gender identity groups regarding the means of intention to leave.

Organizational commitment
Organizational commitment means biased and emotional commitment of employees to the goals and values of the organization they work for. It is suggested that organizational commitment consists of internalization addressing to the employee's perception of targets and goals of the organization as their own targets and goals, adoption addressing to the employee's adoption of their roles and services in the organization, and loyalty addressing to the employee's loyalty to the organization (Buchanan, 1974). All organizations and their departments desire their employees to be committed to them. This is because employees with a high level of organizational commitment devote more capability, energy and time to their organization (Hunt, Chonko, & Wood, 1985). Salespeople with high organizational commitment may produce results in favor of the organization with regard to matters like job satisfaction, intention to leave, leave of job, and customerbased sales (Jaramillo, Mulki, & Marshall, 2005). In the sales management literature, it is suggested that there is no difference between saleswomen and salesmen in terms of organizational commitment (Macintosh & Krush, 2014;Monciref et al., 2000;Paul & Garg, 2014;Siguaw & Honeycutt, 1995;Schul & Wren, 1992) without Tyagi and Wotruba (1998). It is also stated that the level of organizational commitment may vary depending on the industry and number of saleswomen within the sales force (Monciref et al., 2000). No study analyzing organizational commitment in terms of gender identity was found in the literature reviews.
On the basis of findings in the literature, it was expected in this study that there would be no difference of organizational commitment among biological sex groups. It was also expected that feminine characteristics like being loyal, friendly, and sympathetic would bring organizational commitment, while masculine characteristics like being dominant, risk-taking, ambitious, and courageous would reduce organizational commitment. Thus, hypotheses were: H5: There is not a difference in sex groups regarding the means of organizational commitment.
H6: There is a difference in gender identity groups regarding the means of organizational commitment.

Job satisfaction
Job satisfaction is described as a set of positive and negative feelings and emotions of employees for their jobs (Newstrom & Davis, 1993). In the sales management literature, job satisfaction is accepted as a result of the satisfactions felt for the job itself, wage, promotion, workmates, managers, company policies and customers, which are qualified as the dimensions of job satisfaction (Boles, Wood, & Johnson,2003;Rutherford, Boles, Hamwi, Madupalli, & Rutherford, 2009). Satisfied salespeople may generate favorable results for their organizations. For instance, these salespeople have a higher tendency to keep their job and ability to work harder when compared to other salespeople (Boles et al., 2003).
The sales management literature gives mixed results concerning whether being a woman or a man will make any difference in their job satisfaction. There are results suggesting both that saleswomen have a lower level of job satisfaction (Kennedy & Lawton, 1992;Swan, Futrell, Sex and gender identity differences in psychological job outcomes among salespeople & Todd, 1978) and that they have a higher level of job satisfaction (Gable & Reed, 1987;Tyagi & Wotruba, 1998). On the other hand, results showing that there is no difference of job satisfaction level among salespeople in terms of sex are also found (Busch & Bush, 1978;Çabuk & Keleş, 2011;Franke & Park, 2006;Macintosh & Krush, 2014;Monciref et al., 2000;Schul & Wren, 1992;Siguaw & Honeycutt, 1995). In such studies presenting no difference, this result is grounded on the eventually decreasing tokenism and gender discrimination for saleswomen, personal and social practices specific to women (Monciref et al., 2000), women's embracing the sales profession and developments in favor of women. Saleswomen's high level of job satisfaction is based on considering sales profession as a career opportunity (Gable & Reed, 1987), and it is also suggested that this high level of job satisfaction stems from their lower expectations from the job when compared to men (Clark, 1997). When reviewed in terms of job satisfaction, there are mixed results in the literature. A relevant study suggests that support of managers is important for the job satisfaction of saleswomen and there is no difference between women and men with regard to the support of workmates (Dubinsky, Jolson, Michaeles, Kotabe, & Lim, 1993). Another study reveals that there is no difference of satisfaction level between women and men in terms of wage, customers, job itself, managers, promotion and workmates (Busch & Bush, 1978).
It is seen in the general literature that there are differences of job satisfaction among gender identity groups (Eichinger, 2000;Eichinger, Heifetz & Ingraham, 1991;Jagacinski, 1987;Krausz & Kedem, Tal, & Amir, 1992;Lipinska-Grobelny & Wasilak, 2010). They show that androgynous individuals have a higher level of job satisfaction. Behavioral flexibility of androgynous individuals is accepted to be the reason behind their high level of job satisfaction (Eichinger, 2000). However, no study analyzing the job satisfaction in terms of gender identity groups was found in the sales literature reviews.
In accordance with the general tendency in the literature, it was expected in this study that the level of job satisfaction of salespeople would not change according to the biological sex, but vary according to the gender identity groups. In this regard: H7: There is not a difference in sex groups regarding the means of job satisfaction.
H8: There is a difference in gender identity groups regarding the means of job satisfaction.

Sample
The sample covered pharmaceutical salespeople from south-central region of Turkey. Based on a recent study conducted in this region, it was understood that there were 22 pharmaceutical companies and approximately 700 salespeople were employed in them (Kara, Andaleeb, Turan, & Cabuk, 2013). Sekaran (2003) asserts that the appropriate sample size is 248 when the population includes 700 individuals. Considering this value and the possibility of inaccurate and uncompleted questionnaires, 310 questionnaires were decided to be applied, 307 of which were useful for the analysis. Using convenience sampling, the data was obtained from pharmaceutical salespeople via self-administered questionnaire method. The variety of demographical features of the participants was taken into account during the distribution of the questionnaires. The questionnaires were distributed and collected by 4 pollsters in three months in 2014, with no missing values. Questionnaires lasted 15 min on average.
The demographic characteristics of respondents were as follows: 37.1% of the respondents were female and 62.9% were male. Average age was between 25-38 years, 65.5% of respondents were married, and 22.4% of the participants had an income between 2001 and 3000 TL. Also, most of them had a bachelor degree (91.8%).

Questionnaire and scale
The questionnaire form included items to measure job stress, organizational commitment, intention to leave, and job satisfaction as psychological job outcomes and psychological gender (gender identity). The respondents were required to inform their agreement degree in 79 items and answer 5 demographical questions. All the variables were measured using seven-point Likert scales formed as, '1 -certainly disagree', '4 -neither agree nor disagree', and '7 -certainly agree' for job stress, organizational commitment, intention to leave and job satisfaction. In the scales of gender identity, '7 means never suitable; 4 means neither suitable nor unsuitable; 1 means always suitable'. Well-established scales were purposive to facilitate appraisement of the research variables. Thus, all the measures were drawn from previous research in the literature that has widely used and proven their validity and reliability. Scale for job stress was taken after House and Rizzo (1972); organizational commitment was assessed using the short form scales from Mowday, Steers, & Porter, 1979; scale for intention to leave was taken after Seashore, Lawler, Mirvis and Cammann (1982) and job satisfaction was measured by using the scale of Minnesota short form (Weiss, Davis, & England, 1967). As to gender identity, considering that it is reflected by culture (Schruijer, 2006;Wood & Eagly, 2015), the Turkish culture version of BSRI developed by Dökmen is used (Dökmen, 1999). Its reliability and validity analyses were also performed by Dökmen (Dökmen 1991(Dökmen , 1999. This scale includes 20 masculine and 20 feminine personality traits.
As a pre-test, preliminary versions of the questionnaire were practiced with 40 salespeople to assure that the participants understood the questions clearly and that no semantic and measurement problems existed. After making the necessary revisions, the questionnaire was conducted to participants.

Measure validation and descriptive statistics
Cronbach α coefficients were calculated to determine the reliability of scales used in the study. The internal consistency for all of the scales were reasonable, seeing that the reliability of each scale exceeded the criterion of 0.70 typically judged as acceptable (Hair, Celsi, Money, Samouel, & Page, 2011), as presented in Table 1. Note. ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed) 1 -certainly disagree; 4 -neither agree nor disagree; 7 -certainly agree. JS: job stress; OC: organizational commitment; ITL: intention to leave; JSAT: job satisfaction Various non-statistical methods can be helpful to measure validity comparing to reliability (Gegez, 2010). To establish validity, all scales used in the study were adopted from previous studies (mentioned above) where the reliability and validity of the measures are confirmed. Furthermore all the measures which are used as unidimensional were drawn from previous research from both Turkish and global literatures that have widely used and proven Sex and gender identity differences in psychological job outcomes among salespeople their validity and reliability many times (Bilgiç, 2010;Schul & Wren, 1992;Sims & Sun, 2012;Swimberghe, Jones, & Darrat, 2014;Turunç & Erkuş, 2010;Wren, Berkowitz, & Grant, 2014). Three academicians criticized the scales to support content validity. A pre-test was performed to increase the understanding of the statement and prevent semantic and measurement problems. As seen in Table 1, the correlation coefficient of the variables provided evidence supporting the nomological validity, which means scales used in this study, known to be correlated theoretically, have significant correlation between them.  (Jaramillo et al. 2009;Johson & Sohli, 2014;Lambert et al., 2016;Yapraklı & Yılmaz, 2007). The negative correlations were also observed to be coherent with the previous research between ITL and both OC (Babakus, Cravens, Johnston, & Moncrief, 1996;Brashear et al., 2003;Jaramillo et al., 2009;Jaramillo et al., 2006;Naumann, Widmier, & Jackson, 2000) and JSAT (Babakus et al., 1996;Boles, Madupalli, Rutherford, & Wood, 2007;Brashear et al., 2003;Jaramillo et al., 2009;Jaramillo et al., 2006;Naumann et al., 2000).
The means of all variables ranged from 3.281 to 4.989 as given in Table 1. It was observed that the respondents had medium level job stress and organizational commitment and had relatively higher job satisfaction. It could also be claimed that they had lower level of intention to leave. Also, the correlation coefficients ranged from -0.375 to 0.591 which denoted medium and weak level correlations between the variables (Table 1).

Data analysis
SPSS 16 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) software was used in all statistical analyses. The analysis of independent sample t-test was carried out to determine whether there is a difference in sex and gender groups regarding the job stress, organizational commitment, intention to leave, and job satisfaction or not, as in many previous research about the sex and gender differences (Bolat & Odacı, 2016;Gianakos, 2000;Özkan & Lajunen, 2005;Schruijer, 2006;Tanrıkulu, 2014). Based on the central limit theorem, it was accepted that the assumption of normality was satisfied in this study 1 .

Results
The results of the t-test analyses carried out to determine the sex difference in psychological job outcomes were presented in Table 2. It could be deduced from t-test that there were significant statistical differences between sex groups in organizational commitment (t=4.0947, p<0.05), intention to leave (t=-3.497, p<0.05) and job satisfaction (t=2.088, p<0.05) while that was false for job stress (p>0.05). Thus, H1 and H3 were supported but H5 and H7 were not. The results indicated that both women and men had equal means regarding job stress although women had higher organizational commitment and job satisfaction and had lower intention to leave.
Gender identities of participants were identified by using Dökmen's approach (1999) before performing the t-test for hypothesis about the gender identity group differences. Among participants, those with a median of 5.55 and above, in respect of answers given to femininity statements in the gender identity scale, were determined as feminine and those with a median of 5.20 and above in respect of answers given to masculinity statements were determined as masculine with respect to Dökmen (1999). Also, participants remaining below medians in both types of points were classified as indifferent and those above these medians
The results of the t-test for the gender identity group differences were shown in Table  2. It was understood from the results of the t-test that there existed statistically significant differences between gender identity groups in job stress (t= 3.013, p<0.05), intention to leave (t=4.468, p<0.05), organizational commitment (t=-3.994, p<0.05), and job satisfaction (t=5.649, p<0.05) which implied that masculine and androgynous respondents had different means regarding the psychological job outcomes. Thus, H2, H4, H6, and H8 were accepted. The means of each group were taken into account in order to determine which group had higher psychological job outcomes. The results demonstrated that the means of masculine respondents were higher in both job stress (4.680) and intention to leave (3.770), whereas androgynous respondents were higher in both organizational commitment (4.780) and job satisfaction (5.334). The androgynous respondents had more organizational commitment and job satisfaction while they had lower job stress and intention to leave.

Discussion and conclusion
This study examined whether there was any difference among sex and gender identity groups according to psychological job outcomes. To this extent, job stress, organizational commitment, intention to leave, and job satisfaction were accepted as psychological job outcomes.
According to the basic findings of the study, female and male participants had an equal level of job stress. This finding was compatible with the previous findings suggesting that there is no difference of job stress between saleswomen and salesmen (Jaramillo et al., 2009;Monciref et al., 2000;Yapraklı & Yılmaz, 2007). Thus, it may be argued that sex has a decreasing importance in the sensation of stress arising from the sales profession. On the other hand, findings of this study comparing masculine and androgynous individuals showed that androgynous ones had a lower level of job stress. Previous findings indicating that androgynous individuals have a lower level of anxiety and tendency to depression (Demirtaş-Madran, 2012;Dökmen, 2003), lower level of perceived stress (Jones et al., 2016), less affected by societal pressure and traditional impositions (Bolat & Odacı, 2016), dreams about positive things and feel adequacy (Dökmen, 2003) support this finding of the study. In addition, strategies of coping with stress (Cheng, 2005;Gianakos, 2000) and behavioral flexibility (Eichinger, 2000) specific to androgynous individuals were thought to have an influence on androgynous participant's lower level of job stress and their ability to manage and cope with the stress caused by the sales profession. Androgynous salespeople have the ability to respond appropriately, be relaxed, and thus adapt to unexpected situations in various sales circumstances (Jolson & Comer, 1997) that may be why they have a lower level of job stress in the sales environment, which requires multiple roles for salespeople. With a general view to job stress in terms of sex and gender identity, findings of this study verify the findings of previous studies arguing that gender identity is important rather than (biological) sex (Shen, 2014;Wu & Shih, 2010). In light of these findings, sales managers should take gender identity (psychological gender) into account in order to reduce job stress.
It is determined that participants generally did not have an intention to leave, however male participants had a higher intention to leave when compared to women participants. This finding supported the finding of a previous study (Ladik et al., 2002), while it did not comply with some others (Busch & Bush, 1978;Monciref et al., 2000;Schul & Wren,1992). On the other hand, it was thought that the reason behind participants' low level of intention to leave could be their adoption of the sales profession and the organization they work for. Moreover, female participants' low intention to leave shows that women's loyalty and recessiveness to take risks, work life and sales community change in favor of women and women get stronger in the work life. Another finding of this subject showed that masculine participants had a higher level of intention to leave. The fact that men and masculine persons are ambitious and willing to take risks may steer them into better jobs. Also, androgynous individual's flexibility and having higher career decision-making self-efficacy (Bolat & Odacı, 2016) may be the explanations for their low level of intention to leave.
In contradistinction to previous studies (Monciref et al., 2000;Schul & Wren, 1992;Siguaw & Honeycutt, 1995), it was determined in this study that female participants had a higher level of organizational commitment, which supported Tygai and Wotruba (1998). This surprising finding was thought to be caused by socio-economic and cultural differences among countries where the study was conducted. Another relevant finding was that androgynous participants had higher organizational commitment. It was suggested that behavioral flexibility characteristics of androgynous individuals provide an advantage in this regard. These individuals' capability to display situational behaviors ensures that they perceive goals and purposes of the organization like their own goals and purposes and adopt the service they provide (Buchanan, 1974), which serve as the building blocks of organizational commitment, and increase their organizational commitment. Also, the negative correlation between OC and ITL observed in this study and literature confirms the high level of OC for androgynous individuals with low level of intention to leave. Furthermore, the properties of androgynous individuals being less affected by societal pressure and traditional impositions (Bolat & Odacı, 2016) and feeling adequacy (Dökmen, 2003) may also be the reason for high level of OC.
A key finding of the study was that job satisfaction showed difference among sex groups and women had a higher level of job satisfaction. While this finding promoted certain studies with mixed results in the sales literature (Gable & Reed, 1987), it was contrary to the studies suggesting that there is no difference (Busch & Bush, 1978;Çabuk & Keleş, 2011;Franke & Park, 2006;Monciref et al., 2000;Schul & Wren, 1992;Siguaw & Honeycutt, 1995). This may be grounded on the fact that women see the sales profession as a career opportunity (Gable & Reed, 1987) and have a lower expectation from the job (Clark, 1997) or that women adopt the sales profession and have the ability to cope with the difficulties of this profession. It also supported the suggestions of other finding of this study that women and men had no difference of job stress in terms of coping with difficulties and they experienced a medium level of job stress.
According to another important finding of the study, there was a difference in job satisfaction levels of gender identity groups, and androgynous individuals had a higher level of job satisfaction when compared to masculine individuals. This finding provided further support to contention about the behavioral flexibility (Bem & Lewis, 1975) and findings of previous studies (Eichinger, 2000;Eichinger et al., 1991;Jagacinski, 1987;Krausz et al., 1992;Lipinska-Grobelny & Wasilak, 2010). Many studies in the literature suggest that, as a requirement of the current sales conditions, salespeople should display both masculine and feminine characteristics, namely androgynous characteristics (Gelibolu & Tanrıkulu, 2014;Jolson & Comer, 1997;Lagace & Twible, 1990;McFarland & Kidwell, 2006). Thus, androgynous people's high level of job satisfaction may be grounded on their adequate fulfillment of the requirements of the sales profession as a result of having androgynous characteristics. Furthermore, from the point of view of behavioral flexibility, the fact that androgynous individuals have an adaptation advantage, or in other words, they have the ability to display masculine or feminine behaviors as necessary and that they can give appropriate responses, act comfortably and thus adapt to unexpected situations (Jolson & Comer, 1997), explains this high level of job satisfaction. Feeling adequate for the sales professions and having self-efficiency in career decision may also encourage the job satisfaction of androgynous individuals. Also, this finding was supported by the correlation between JSAT and both OC and JS observed in this study. Androgynous participants had positive feelings and emotions about their jobs, had less job stress and also had loyalty to their organization as related to this gratification.
Evaluation of the findings obtained in this study in consideration of the conditions in Turkey would be useful for both literature and practice. According to the Turkish Statistical Institute (TUİK) (2015), the unemployment rate for males with bachelor degree was 23.4% while this rate for females was 34.4%, so unemployment rate was higher for females (TUİK, 2015). Women are mostly in the position of housewives in Turkey, where employment of women is much lower than employment of men. This can be considered as an effect of the lower level of intention to leave for female participants; however, it should be taken into account that men in Turkey have a major role of providing the income for the family. Therefore, men can show higher level of intention to leave than women for a job having higher income or women can show lower intention to leave because of the socioeconomic advantages of having a job. Moreover, one of the most distinct changes in the labor force profile is the increase in the participation of women in labor force in Turkey. In addition to the rapid increase in the participation of women in sales force, it may also be stated that the educational level of salespeople, especially in the health sector, is high. Thus, one of the reasons for women is that socializing, career, proving oneself, and economic opportunities provided by the sales profession increase job satisfaction and organizational commitment and decrease intention to leave for them. Another reason is the expectation of being freer, more flexible and adaptable in return for changing environmental conditions for modern Turkish women (Özkan & Lajunen, 2005). Furthermore, mature and loyal role of women in Turkish culture may be seen as another reason of their high level of organizational commitment and low level of intention to leave.
Findings of the study allowed for the development of certain suggestions for administrative implications. Sex and gender become crucial agenda in management of sales force due to the increase in number of saleswomen and observed diversity of gender identity in society. Differences in sex and gender identity groups should be taken into account during the adjustment of management strategies. In this study, positive results about saleswomen and androgynous salesperson were achieved. As women have a higher level of job satisfaction and organizational commitment and lower level of intention to leave, they may be preferred in the sales profession. Besides, job satisfaction and organizational commitment of women may be enhanced by supporting them in overcoming the obstacles posed by being a woman by means of administrative implications (flexible working hours, home office working, training, etc.). Androgynous people have more of the characteristics that are emphasized and attempted to be provided by managers, namely high level of organizational commitment and job satisfaction and low level of intention to leave and job stress and, therefore, it is recommended to take androgenicity as an important criterion in the selection of salespeople. By promoting androgenicity in the motivation of current salespeople, it may be ensured that job outcomes of salespeople reach to the desired level. More satisfied job outcomes may be obtained from androgynous salespeople by supporting these characteristics of them through trainings. It may be also useful to encourage salespeople from other gender groups by means of trainings that will bring them androgynous traits, especially behavioral flexibility. As there are mostly masculine persons in the sales profession, these trainings should put emphasis on certain feminine characteristics, like loyalty, to steer them into androgenicity. It may also be useful to assign men and masculine persons with tasks by which they may put forward their characteristics like competition, displaying strength and leadership in order to increase their job satisfaction and organizational commitment.
Among gender identity groups, only masculine and androgynous groups were compared in this study. Therefore, the study gave no information concerning feminine and undifferentiated individuals. Besides, it is also seen in the sales literature reviews that participants of the previous studies are mostly masculine and androgynous (Comer & Jolson, 1985;Lagace & Twible, 1990;Tanrıkulu & Efeoglu, 2015;Teer et al., 1992) and psychological genders of salespeople are characterized as androgynous (Gelibolu & Tanrıkulu, 2014;Lagace & Twible, 1990). On the other hand, the differences among the mentioned groups showed that there was a difference among gender identity groups in general. Due to the sampling method used in the study, the sample only covered pharmaceutical salespeople and therefore the possibility to generalize findings of the study is restricted. Therefore, it is recommended for further studies to analyze salespeople in different sectors. Studies in this area may be grounded on quantitative and qualitative researches and longitudinal studies Ceyda Tanrikulu will be useful for following and understanding the changes in salespeople in accordance with the changes in gender identity in the course of time. In this study, only the psychological job outcomes were analyzed and it is recommended for future studies to examine the behavioral job outcomes. It is suggested that the gender role has an influence on work-related behaviors (Gianakos, 2000), while gender does not correspond to behavior, but individuals act in genderalized behavior patterns, which follow gender role identity (Woodhill & Samuels, 2003). As studies on gender identity in the sales literature are inadequate, it would be useful to analyze behaviors of salespeople in terms of gender role for academic studies and practitioners to understand these behaviors.
In conclusion, this study pointed out that there already exist sex differences and also gender identity differences regarding the job outcomes in sales force. It revealed that there were differences of psychological job outcomes (excluding job stress) between saleswomen and salesmen and also masculine salesperson and androgynous salesperson. The fact that women had a high level of job satisfaction and organizational commitment and a low level of intention to leave may be accepted as a factor that strengthens the position of saleswomen in the sales force and shows that they adopt this profession. This study proved that, besides biological sex, gender identity as psychological gender may also be an important variable in the classification of salespeople and analysis of salespeople in terms of administrative variables, bringing a new and different approach to elucidate gender-based differences in job outcomes. Therefore, the main contribution of this study to the literature and practitioners is to give them an insight about the significance of gender identity to identify the difference of psychological job outcomes in sales force. Another contribution is being a pioneer study to investigate gender identity as a differential reason of salespeople in Turkey, where Western and Islamic cultures are mixed, gender identities have undergone a change, the number of saleswomen is increasing, and it is an attractive emerging market for global companies. This study also provides further understanding to implication that androgynous individuals have the most appropriate gender identity for sales profession, considering that they had a high level of job satisfaction and organizational commitment and a low level of job stress and intention to leave.

Note
1 Central limit theorem: The means of samples show normal distribution as the sample size increases (Nakip, 2003, p. 202). The sample size should be larger than 30 or 50 for this theorem to be used according to one of the common visions (Kurtuluş, 2004, p. 99).